You need Frame-relay Traffic-shaping command placed on the physical interface (wha tI mean by that is Serial0/0........... NOT s0/0.101) So not the PVC when you use FRF.12 traditional way (aka cir, mincir, bc, be) and MLP.
You do not put in on the physical interface when you use the CB Shaping way for FRF.12 (aka nested policy-maps) Thanks, Ryan Trauernicht On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, anil batra <anil...@yahoo.com> wrote: > 1. Let's say BR1 to HQ we are to use MLP with LFI but for BR2 to HQ we are > to use FRF.12 Fragmentation. What I understand is we will use MLP with LFI > between HQ-BR1 with NO "frame-realy traffic-shaping" command on major > interface. Now on BR2 to HQ as we are supposed to use FRF.12 , in this case > we will have to use Legacy FRTS for this link but not MQC-FRTS right ??? > > 2. I am little confused whe do you need to put "frame-realy > traffic-shaping" command on major interface - > > MLP - I think NO > Legacy FRTS - I think NO > MQC-FRTS - I think YES > > regards // anil > > > --- On *Tue, 1/13/09, Vik Malhi <vma...@ipexpert.com>* wrote: > > From: Vik Malhi <vma...@ipexpert.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS MLP 1 link and FRF Shaping the other > verification > To: "Ryan Trauernicht" <ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com> > Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 4:16 AM > > > You must do it the old school way if you are using a single physical > interface. > The old school way being FRTS as opposed to class-based shaping. > > Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com > > Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups & Study Communities > atwww.IPexpert.com/communities > > On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:43 PM, "Ryan Trauernicht" > <ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I know when you put the "frame-relay traffic-shaping" on the > physical interface it turns all the CIRs down to 56k. > > > > If you have 1 pipe that is MLP FRF which you need to put that command on > the interface and the other pip is just shaping FRF. I just wanted to make > sure > you can not do the nested policy-map way. You must do it the old school > map-class way for (cir, mincir, bc, be). > > > > Vik can you comment on that or anyone else who knows for sure. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Ryan Trauernicht > > >
