Thinking about my class-map to look like the following for marking on the ingress
Class-map match-any SCCP Match protocol skinny Match protocol h323 Match protocol mgcp Match protocol sip match ip dscp cs3 match ip dscp af31 Class-map match-any RTP Match protocol rtp audio match ip dscp ef any thoughts? On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Cyrus <cyrus....@gmail.com> wrote: > Ryan > > I will use it ,it's more easy to use NBAR than access lists. same result. > High process utilization does not breaking any lab requirements if nothing > specified. > > > > I know when it comes to lab exam, picking up the right tool becomes a > nightmare ,I'm too fussy about it! :) > > > Cyrus > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Ryan Trauernicht < > ryanstudyvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Anyone got thoughts on using NBAR for the lab to mark packets? >> Best practice in the field is to use access-lists b/c NBAR causes to much >> processor power, but will you be docked if you just used NBAR for protocols >> (skinny, h323, mgcp, sip)? >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan Trauernicht >> > > > > -- > Sirus Moghadasian > CCIE #21862 (R&S) >
