Thank you Cliff & Anil. This should be good for me to dig further.
Good day guys. Mann. On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Cliff McGlamry <cl...@mcglamry.net> wrote: > Add the following command to your gateway: > > voice service voip > allow h323 to h323 > > > That should fix it. > > Cliff > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mann Chaddha" <mann.chad...@gmail.com> > To: "Cliff McGlamry" <cl...@mcglamry.net> > Cc: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:13 AM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FAC on Internal DN > > > Cliff > > That is certainly possible but still there is a requirement of some > authentication before patching he call to the system. > > And I guess a vanila H323 GW also will not hairpin as both the call > legs are VoIP. We may need IPIPGW to achieve that. > > Do you have any idea of how to reoriginate the call from one Dial Peer > to another? > > Thanks > Mann > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Cliff McGlamry <cl...@mcglamry.net> wrote: >> Why not just put it in a partition and limit who can dial it by only >> including it in a limited set of Call Search Spaces? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mann Chaddha" <mann.chad...@gmail.com> >> To: "Cliff McGlamry" <cl...@mcglamry.net> >> Cc: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:15 AM >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FAC on Internal DN >> >> >> Thanks Cliff >> >> Basically we are interfacing a Public Announceement System(PAS) with >> an analog port on a VG248. The PAS doesn't have any builtin >> authentication & so I need to enforce FAC on the DN itself. >> >> Mann. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Cliff McGlamry <cl...@mcglamry.net> >> wrote: >>> MGCP can make it work only if it's going to be hairpinned via the PSTN. >>> >>> If you use H323, you can run it in and out on VOIP dial-peers. >>> >>> H323 would likely be a better way to go if you must do this. That said, >>> this is a pretty strange requirement. I would ask some hard questions >>> about >>> exactly WHY this needs to be done. It might be more appropriate to do >>> something where you are working with CDR after the fact and billing based >>> on >>> that back to the originating station. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Mann Chaddha" <mann.chad...@gmail.com> >>> To: <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:55 PM >>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FAC on Internal DN >>> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> We’ve come across a typical requirement wherein we need to enable >>> FAC(Forced Auth Code) on an Internal DN. >>> >>> I was thinking of creating a RP & hair pinning it back from a GW to >>> the required DN.This DN could be only in this GW's CSS. >>> >>> Is this possible with MGCP or I need to have only H.323 GW? What will >>> be the required config on the Gateway? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Mann >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
