Roger,
When I responded to you we were not setup to support said below configuration. But as we kept getting the requests for it from the configurations that were being handed out I took the assumption that it was something promised by Mark that was never finished. So I finished the configuration on our edge and gave the configuration to Matt. It will work now. Regards, Tyson Scott From: Vik Malhi [mailto:vma...@ipexpert.com] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:04 AM To: Tyson Scott Subject: FW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice vRack Configuration Request FYI....not sure if any reply is required or not. -- Vik Malhi CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. ------ Forwarded Message From: Roger Källberg <roger.kallb...@cygate.se> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:17:53 +0100 To: "Berry, Matthew J." <mjbe...@krollontrack.com>, OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice vRack Configuration Request Hi Matthew. This is my config file, they are for a 1812 and a 3560. I sent these to IPExpert a few weeks ago, so that they maybe could add them to their examples or use them whenever they got a request for a similar setup. Your setup sounds to me to be almost exact what I have. I used this somewhat unorthodox way of setting it up because I couldnt get it to work the suggested config that you got from Tyson Scott. Im actually somewhat surprised by his answer for two reasons, first because of this reply I got from him when I asked about a similar setup that he now suggested that you would use. We are not setup to support what he is trying to do. and secondly because of the posts on their IPExpert blog or maybe its on the Proctorlabs forum that Mark Snow made about changes to the VPN. Network Extension Mode (NEM) is now supported for every Voice vRack. I have now enabled (and tested thoroughly today) NEM for those of you using hardware-based VPN to connect your hardware IP phones to our Proctor Labs Voice vRacks. This will not work with software based VPNs. This means that none of your traffic will have to NAT or PAT any longer to reach us and all of these issues with phones not registering correctly, or registering and then when a call is made potentially unregistering the phone from the cluster. For hardware VPN users, make the following change: crypto ipsec client ezvpn IPx-Voice-vRack mode network-extension In order to use the Network Extension Mode, and also not to override any of the internal subnets for the Voice vRack Pod you are on, I have enabled a small set of subnets that you may use for your *inside* interface on your IOS Router or ASA. They are: 192.168.X.0/24 Where X can equal any number 0 16. so 192.168.0.0 , 192.168.1.0 , you get the picture. Any other network on your inside and we dont redistribute it through the vRack (i.e. No route back to you :) If anyone needs any other networks email support and let us know about them. The trouble with Tyson Scotts suggestion is that some of the suggested networks is outside of the above stated, maybe not a problem because of later additions off networks. But there havent been any official updates on this, so as far as we know this is still valid. Brgds, Roger Källberg Unified Communication Consultant Cygate AB From: Berry, Matthew J. [mailto:mjbe...@krollontrack.com] Sent: den 18 december 2009 22:55 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice vRack Configuration Request Support, I am a new CCIE Voice lab student who is trying to connect to Proctor Labs Vracks. On my end, I am using a Cisco 2811 and a Catalyst 3750 POE switch. I have attached show tech from both devices. With the help of Drew Leplant, I was able to establish the VPN connection. However, I have been having an issue setting up the equipment on my end to communicate with the remote lab. My biggest issue at this point is a lack of example for how the POE switch and router should be setup to carry RTP traffic to HQ, BR1, and BR2. I can establish a connection to the rack and ping 10.10.100.2 from my router. However, I cannot figure out how the VLANs should be setup on my end. You have a sample configuration for a 2811 with an 8-port ESW. This contains information on a working voice setup. However, what about users who do not have an ESW? The 2811 sample configuration on ProctorLabs.com establishes a connection to the vRack, but doesnt address the VLAN setup needed on my end in order for the phones to connect to the devices on your end. Would you be able to produce a modified configuration example for a 2811 with a 3750 switch? I think this would address the need of many students who are using a router and switch on their end. I am copying the OSL on this email too, so others can be made aware of this and share their insights as well. This doesnt need to be answered tomorrow, but I cannot practice my labs until this is figured out. Please let me know if there is anything I can do on my end to assist. Thanks, Matthew Berry, Sr. Unified Communications Engineer, CCVP Kroll Ontrack | 9023 Columbine Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55347 952 516 3748 | Fax 952 562 2175 | Mobile 952 221 2814| mjbe...@krollontrack.com <mailto:agutz...@krollontrack.com> www.krollontrack.com <http://www.krollontrack.com/> _____ _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ------ End of Forwarded Message
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
