I'd be curious when "auto qos voip" changed to CS3 or if it has, but you should 
change it.

The feeling is that QoS SRND needs to be updated for MediaNet/RFC4594 and that 
Auto QoS should only be used in most basic scenarios.

The QoS Baseline recommends marking Call-Signaling to CS3. However, currently 
most Cisco IP
Telephony products mark Call-Signaling to AF31. A marking migration from AF31 
to CS3 is under way
within Cisco, but in the interim it is recommended that both AF31 and CS3 be 
reserved for
Call-Signaling and that Locally-Defined Mission-Critical Data applications be 
marked to a temporary
placeholder non-standard DSCP, such as 25. Upon completion of the migration, 
the QoS Baseline
marking recommendations of CS3 for Call-Signaling and AF31 for Locally-Defined 
Mission-Critical
Data applications should be used. These marking recommendations are more in 
line with RFC 2474 and
RFC 2597.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Berry, Matthew J.
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:55 AM
To: CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the following config 
to the router:

C2970(config)# mls qos
C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56

Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking for audio 
signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking listed above.

As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the command to 
consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would need to be modified:

C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to