Hi I am trying to do this: Phone 1: Line 1---1001 Line 2---1002
Phone 2: Line 1---1003 Line 2---1002 Line 1 on both phone 1 and 2 should be able to receive up to 6 incoming calls but line 2 on phone 1 should be able to receive only 2 calls and line 2 on phone 2 should be able to receive 5 calls. (line 2 on both phones are shared lines) I am able to achieve this via overlay DNs with call waiting but I should be able to see the call on phone 1 line 2 if phone 2 line 2 answered the call (remote in use) and be able to barge in. If I answer call on phone 1 then call is not visible on phone 2 (on line 2 ) >From the admin guide I found out: ephone 1 button 1c1,2,3,4 ! ephone 2 button 1c1,2,3,4 1. A call to ephone-dn 1 rings on ephone 1 and on ephone 2. Ephone 1 answers, and the call is no longer visible to ephone 2. 2. A call to ephone-dn 2 issues a call-waiting notification to ephone 1 and rings on ephone 2, which answers. The second call is no longer visible to ephone 1. 3. A call to ephone-dn 3 issues a call-waiting notification to ephone 1 and ephone 2. Ephone 1 puts the call to ephone-dn 1 on hold and answers the call to ephone-dn 3. The call to ephone-dn 3 is no longer visible to ephone 2. Is there any other way to restrict number of calls on shared lines and still be able to see the calls on other phones and barge in. Thanks Aman -----Original Message----- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 6:22 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 145 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: CUE reset (Otto Sanchez) 2. Re: Standard Local Route List/Group ? (Mike Brooks) 3. Re: SIP Integration of UCM and UC (Otto Sanchez) 4. Re: CUE reset (Randall Saborio) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:17:12 -0430 From: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE reset To: Iwan Hoogendoorn <i...@i-1.nl> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Message-ID: <be6b39441003211447l563dfbe0t55f102e9b470...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hi Iwan, I experienced this before, and applied the same troubleshooting you mentioned, but it was to long to restore the cue functioning. A way I found to get the module back up quickly, was to going to srst mode by shutting down the serial interface between br2 and hq, so, restoring the connection between sites solved my cue issue. I think however, that other ways to get into srst mode would help like setting ucm servers route from br2 to a null interface. Before I encountered the problem, I used to get into srst mode by subscribing br2 devices to a single server ucm group/ device pool and shutting down the call manager service for the corresponding server, hth, On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Iwan Hoogendoorn <i...@i-1.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am having this strange problem that my Cisco Unity Express ? is just > suddenly not working anymore? > > Is this a common problem? > > > > My phones went into SRST more and from there CUE was just working fine ? > but when coming out of SRST mode the phones registered to the CUCM? CUE > suddenly was not working. > > And this is not the first time that I had this? > > > > The only option here is to reload the CUE and as we all know reloading > takes a lot of time (which we don?t have) and it was ok again? > > > > I Reset the Device Pool, Reset the Voicemail Profile, Reset the CTI > ports, for the CUE in offline and then in online modus again ? > > All of these things did not work but reloading works ? > > But then again isn?t there another solution? > > > > > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > With kind regards, > > > > ing. Iwan Hoogendoorn, CCIE3 #13084 (R&S, Sec, SP) > > Homepage: http://www.i-1.nl > > Blog: http://blog.i-1.nl > > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/iwan_ccie > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/iwanhoogendoorn > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100321/904b67e3/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:49:25 -0400 From: Mike Brooks <2xcci...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ? To: Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Message-ID: <267fca631003211449h6b020c4ar35bb942324879...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ahh..yes very good point... I have been moving away from the "new school" routing methods lately because of some of the flexibility issues I have ran into while using it. For instance ANI manipulation based on the type of call. I do prefer sticking to the "old school" routing method if possible, but I will play around with the called party transformations on the gateway. Thanks Randall !! Mike Brooks CCIE#16027 (R&S) On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike (sorry, missed to copy the list on first try), > > > You are missing one option, which is the one I like most. > > For almost all situations, I would go about using Calling Party > Transformations and Called Party Transformations. > > Since these are device specific, you would make a Called Party > Transformation that would be used only by the H323 gateway, and there > prepend a 9. > > Then, on the gateway, you would stick with just one set of dial-peers which > are the same used for SRST. > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mike Brooks <2xcci...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just want to know how most would handle this type of scenario. It >> appears there are multiple ways to configure this. >> >> >> 9.[2-9]XXXXXX -> Standard Local RL (must strip predot because HQ is mgcp >> gw) >> >> *HQ Device Pool:* >> Standard Local Route Group: HQ-MGCP-RG >> >> *BR1 Device Pool:* >> Standard Local Route Group: BR1-H323-RG >> >> >> If either an HQ or BR1 phone makes a local call 9.[2-9]XXXXXX we must >> strip the 9, regardless of which gateway it goes to because HQs standard >> local route group is an MGCP gateway. >> >> So on the BR1-H323 gateway you have 2 options: >> >> 1. make 2 sets of dial-peers with a leading "9" (for SRST) and without a >> leading "9". >> >> 2. on the inbound voip dial-peer preprend a "9" to the called number using >> a translation pattern. >> >> >> Which option seems to be the best choice and why ? Are there any other >> options ? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Mike Brooks >> CCIE#16027 (R&S) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100321/94ecb54d/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:51:18 -0430 From: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Integration of UCM and UC To: Omotayo <adefilabi...@gmail.com> Cc: OSL Group <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Message-ID: <be6b39441003211521kddfbc17k17cf2e938f728...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, Did you take a look at this document? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucm_sip/guide/cucintcucmsip050.html <http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucm_sip/guide/cucintcucmsip050.html>Also, make sure the Redirecting Diversion Header Delivery - Inbound is checked, hth, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Omotayo <adefilabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > i have been able to get this work. i have checked all doc but no solution > I still need help on this > thanks > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Omotayo <adefilabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Any ideas? >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Omotayo <adefilabi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> On Lab 7, after integrating the UCM with the UC using SIP. Pressing the >>> subscriber button, i get the personal greeting message >>> But, when pstn or a local call dials hq phone 2 or br1 phone 2, i hear >>> Hello Cisco unity connection messaging system from a text tone >>> phone............. >>> Any one with an idea why this i s happening >>> >>> NB: I deleted all the preconfigured voicemail port, huntlist, hunt group >>> and hunt pilot on the UCM as the gude does not indicate that it is needed >>> for the integration to wor >>> >>> Thanks for the anticipated response >>> Regards >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100321/7f3c65e7/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:21:54 -0600 From: Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE reset To: Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Message-ID: <5e7ddc9f1003211521t58eb754av6634e156facd2...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Guys, I havent run into such specific problems, but the other day I ran into this document which is related. From it, it seems doing the reload is needed on most occasions, but should try Ottos suggestion first as it would be faster. It mentions a bug but I am still confused on the cause of the failure. CCIE Voice Lab Exam Tips II - How to recover a CUE Module https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3385 On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Otto Sanchez <o...@ipexpert.com> wrote: > Hi Iwan, > > I experienced this before, and applied the same troubleshooting you > mentioned, but it was to long to restore the cue functioning. A way I found > to get the module back up quickly, was to going to srst mode by shutting > down the serial interface between br2 and hq, so, restoring the connection > between sites solved my cue issue. I think however, that other ways to get > into srst mode would help like setting ucm servers route from br2 to a null > interface. > > Before I encountered the problem, I used to get into srst mode by > subscribing br2 devices to a single server ucm group/ device pool and > shutting down the call manager service for the corresponding server, > > hth, > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Iwan Hoogendoorn <i...@i-1.nl> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am having this strange problem that my Cisco Unity Express ? is just >> suddenly not working anymore? >> >> Is this a common problem? >> >> >> >> My phones went into SRST more and from there CUE was just working fine ? >> but when coming out of SRST mode the phones registered to the CUCM? CUE >> suddenly was not working. >> >> And this is not the first time that I had this? >> >> >> >> The only option here is to reload the CUE and as we all know reloading >> takes a lot of time (which we don?t have) and it was ok again? >> >> >> >> I Reset the Device Pool, Reset the Voicemail Profile, Reset the CTI >> ports, for the CUE in offline and then in online modus again ? >> >> All of these things did not work but reloading works ? >> >> But then again isn?t there another solution? >> >> >> >> >> >> Met vriendelijke groet, >> >> With kind regards, >> >> >> >> ing. Iwan Hoogendoorn, CCIE3 #13084 (R&S, Sec, SP) >> >> Homepage: http://www.i-1.nl >> >> Blog: http://blog.i-1.nl >> >> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/iwan_ccie >> >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/iwanhoogendoorn >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Otto Sanchez > CCIE #25592 (Voice) > Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100321/650fd775/attachment.htm ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CCIE_Voice mailing list CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 145 ******************************************* _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
