Angel,

I believe I was running into the same problem the other day.

What I came to figure, is that it the policy maps and classes seemed to be
all correct, because the counters would increase on the class but never the
compress stats.

What I found, which I think is the correct answer, is that you cannot apply
class based cRTP to a frame-relay map class or similar.

Whenever you have a frame-relay map class, you must go to the sub interface,
and do:
frame-relay ip rtp header-compression

However if you would apply the exact same policy map to a Virtual Template
for MLP LFI, the cRTP would work just fine.

I believe there is some lab that is misleading, because it asks you to
configure class based cRTP with FRF.12, which from my practice can't be
done.

I believe I read somewhere that class based cRTP and frame-relay don't
match, but can't find it again. If someone could validate or refute my
findings, will be appreciated.

Cheers.


On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Angel Perez <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi:
>
> After a reload the class map in classifiying packets correctly, but crtp
> doesn't work either.
>
> *
>         Class-map: med (match-any)
>           825 packets, 52840 bytes
>
>           5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol rtp
>             824 packets, 52736 bytes
>
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol rtcp
>             1 packets, 104 bytes
>
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Priority: 52 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>
>           compress:
>               header ip rtp
>               UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
>                 Sent:    0 total, 0 compressed,
>                          0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
>                          rate 0 bps
> *
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:28:13 +0000
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CB Traffic shapping compress rtp headers
>
>
> Hello:
>
> I want to compress rtp headers. The policy map is catching
> traffic becouse I can see class-map "med"  packets growing, but the problem
> I have is that med class is not classifing this traffic as rtp, so I guess
> this is way rtp compression is not working
>
> This situattion is very strange becouse the class-map is matching rtp or
> rtcp (match any)  so one of the two protocol counters should grow like the
> class-map counter (see output)
>
> Could this be a bug? Any suggestions?
>
>
> I've the following class map and policy map:
>
> *class-map match-any med
>  match protocol rtp
>  match protocol rtcp
> class-map match-any sig
>  match protocol h323
>  match protocol mgcp
>  match protocol rsvp
>  match protocol sip
>  match protocol skinny
> !
> !
> policy-map voice
>  class med
>     priority 52
>     compress head ip rtp
>  class sig
>     bandwidth 16
>  class class-default
>     fair-queue
> policy-map shapping
>  class class-default
>     shape average 384000 3840
>   service-policy voice*
> **
> show policy-map interface serial 0/2/0.102
>
>
> *HQ#sh policy-map interface seri 0/2/0.102
>  Serial0/2/0.102: DLCI 102 -*
> *  Service-policy output: shapping*
> *    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>       10855 packets, 682844 bytes
>       5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>       Match: any
>       Queueing
>       queue limit 64 packets
>       (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>       (pkts output/bytes output) 10855/682844
>       shape (average) cir 384000, bc 3840, be 3840
>       target shape rate 384000
>         lower bound cir 0,  adapt to fecn 0*
> *      Service-policy : voice*
> *        queue stats for all priority classes:
>           Queueing
>           queue limit 64 packets
>           (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>           (pkts output/bytes output) 6725/430332*
> *        Class-map: med (match-any)
>           6725 packets, 430332 bytes
>           5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol rtp
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol rtcp
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Priority: 52 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0
>
>           compress:
>               header ip rtp
>               UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP)
>                 Sent:    0 total, 0 compressed,
>                          0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent
>                          rate 0 bps*
>
> *        Class-map: sig (match-any)
>           158 packets, 13676 bytes
>           5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol h323
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol mgcp
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol rsvp
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol sip
>             0 packets, 0 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Match: protocol skinny
>             158 packets, 13676 bytes
>             5 minute rate 0 bps
>           Queueing
>           queue limit 64 packets
>           (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
>           (pkts output/bytes output) 158/13676
>           bandwidth 16 kbps*
> *        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
>           3972 packets, 238836 bytes
>           5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
>           Match: any
>           Queueing
>           queue limit 64 packets
>           (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0
>           (pkts output/bytes output) 3972/238836
>           Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16*
> **
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it 
> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
> ------------------------------
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up 
> now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to