From my understanding, route list trumps route pattern when digit
manipulation is concerned. However, route pattern manipulations, even
though trumped in the end, will affect what is displayed on the phone
itself.
I'm in line at Starbucks so I can't double-check my notes. Double-
check for yourself. :)
Matthew Berry
**Sent from my iPhone**
Skype/Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Google Voice: +1 612 424 5044
On May 12, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Angel Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello:
I've the following scenario:
route pattern-> route list (h323 gw, mgcp gw)
1: route pattern -> h323 gw
At route pattern level I've strip predot, so at route list I don't
need to strip it, everything works as expected, (the call arrives at
the gw with predot striped)
2: route pattern -> mgcp gw (backup)
When I use the second option (mgcp gw) of the route list, cucm isn't
striping predot at route pattern level, so I've to strip it again at
route list level.
It's strange becouse although the ucm is not striping predot at
route pattern I can see the called number at phone display "TO yyyy"
where yyyy is the called number with predot striped...
IMHO this is not the normal situation, correct me if I'm wrong
Thanks in advance
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. Si
gn up now.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
