Hi, the bandwith assigned to a location affects incoming and outgoing call
to/from this location, this is way is only valid for a hub and spoke topology
(all the calls go throw the hub). If your topology is not hub and spoke you
should use rsvp wich match one to one locations (you specify reservation from
one location to another one)
hth
From: martybeut...@hotmail.com
To: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:59:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 2.2 - CAC Locations
Hey Matthew,
Locations based CAC is suitable for a Hub-and-Spoke topology. The
recommendation would be to use the Hub-none location (with unlimited bandwidth)
at the Hub site (HQ). You would only create new locations for the Spoke sites,
and specify the appropriate bandwidth for the site. Your assignment of 96K to
the BR1 location would be correct.
Hope that helps
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:27:55 -0500
From: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 2 Question 2.2 - CAC Locations
Still trying to understand how Hub_none plays into the mixed when
locations-based CAC is operational. The question asks for a maximum of four
calls "between devices registered at the HQ and BR1 sites." That seems to
imply setting 96 kbps on LOC-BR1 and LOC-HQ. Using a location for HQ would
require changing the Hub_none references to LOC-HQ.
Am I correct in my understanding?
--
Matthew Berry
A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written
Vitals:
GVoice: +1.612.424.5044
Gmail: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Cert Stats:
Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
