I'm pretty sure this doesn't work - the cef load balancing on the router will be based on source-destination ip address pairs so the two calls will take the same path I posted some debugs on this some months ago but I'm on road at the moment and don't have access to them
Graham On 13 Sep 2010, at 16:45, Randall Saborio <ill2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > From some tests I did some time back, I figured RSVP agent does not failover > to redundant links or performs any load balancing. > > Not sure if anyone has tested it. > Will also have to contrast it when using RSVP without RSVP agent, or if CUCM > will failover to other RSVP agents available through the MRGs. > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Stutz, Bernhard <st...@pandacom.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to setup rsvp on 2 redundand links (Vol2-Lab5-5.1). > I configured both links with 64k bandwidth but i don't see there load > balancing happening. All calls will go via the first link and 2nd link is not > been utilized. What needs to be configured to have load balancing occuring? > > HQ-RTR#sh ip rsvp interface > interface allocated i/f max flow max sub max > Se0/0/1:0.1 48K 64K 64K 0 > Se0/0/1:0 48K 1152K 1152K 0 > Se0/0/1:0.2 0 64K 64K 0 > Se0/0/1:0.3 0 112K 112K 0 > > > A 3nd call triggers "Not enough bandwidth" available. > > cheers, > > Bernhard > > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > -- > Randall "da ill" Saborio > CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
