I would go for transcoder. It's more flexible if you need it later in the
lab (e.g. UCCX). G.711 in LAN shouldn't bother you and it might save you
some time.
I can't stop wondering why transcoders cannot do such simple thing as G.729
passtthrough.

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 19:52, David A <david.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Randall and Mann
>
> I tested this and works just like you guys explained.
>
>  I agree Randall that the call drops when using g729 on the
> transcoder. Thanks a lot for the insight :)  I think I would use mtp
> for CUBE rather than a transcoder since the call is g729 across.
>
> Thanks Again
> DA
>
> On 11/13/10, Mann Chaddha <mann.chad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > David
> >
> > If my understanding is right, MTPs also have a DP that they can be
> > associated to ( I don't have a UCM in-front of me now). So I believe
> > you have your MTP in the HQ Region which is talking G729 to the CUBE
> > Trunk Region. And so with MTP its a G729 Call.
> >
> > But with XCoder, which doesn't happen to have any DP, you seem to have
> > it support both G711 & G729 Codecs. UCM will always prefer a higher
> > quality Codec between 2 Endpoints, and so G711 is rightly being
> > negotiated between HQ & XCoder. But the other side is CME whose
> > incoming Dial Peer must be hardcoded to G729 & so your XCoder is
> > converting the media stream to G729 for that feed.
> >
> > I hope this makes sense.
> >
> > Good day.
> > Mann
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:30 PM,
> > <ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com> wrote:
> >> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
> >>        ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>        ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>        ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>   1. CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP (David A)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:36:48 -0500
> >> From: David A <david.a...@gmail.com>
> >> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP
> >> Message-ID:
> >>        
> >> <aanlktin79qdfszb8fvwt8fczdcdwq9ecm0gjbnz+a...@mail.gmail.com<aanlktin79qdfszb8fvwt8fczdcdwq9ecm0gjbnz%2ba...@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I was doing a scenario where in I have HQ gateway setup as a CUBE.
> >>
> >> HQ = MGCP - phones in CUCM - 5002 - Region HQ with 729 to CUBE
> >> BR2 = CME - SCCP Phones
> >> CUBE trunk - Region g729 with all
> >>
> >> I am doing Early Offer on the CUBE with inbount and outbound faststart
> >> and it works fine
> >>
> >> My intial undersanding is that "mtp" is needed on HQ gateway with
> >> g729. Call works fine and both phones use g729.
> >>
> >> I however configured a "transcoder" with g711 and 729 and replaced the
> >> "mtp". Call works fine however in this case HQ phone uses g711 and CME
> >> uses g729 and I see 2 sessions on transcoder.
> >>
> >> All dialpeers are g729 (default voip)
> >>
> >> Can someone please help me understand why the codec used on HQ is g711
> >> in case of transcoder and g729 incase of MTP?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance
> >>
> >> DA
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CCIE_Voice mailing list
> >> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> >>
> >>
> >> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 67
> >> ******************************************
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to