sorry picked up the thread wrong - i thought we were roaming devices between
sites and using extension mobility.



On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Qq Ccie <cci...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for
> Extension Mobility?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Brian <btmulg...@gmail.com>
>
> *To:* Qq Ccie <cci...@yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 1:06:09 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
>
> hi - re EM call routing path: we can use device mobility to flip to the
> roaming device pool to support this.
>
> hth.
> Brian
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Qq Ccie <cci...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Kiwi.  On a side note, calling number transformation has to be
> handled at RL level in order to different calling number requirements
> (local, ld and intl)?
>
> Also, two RPs (\+1919.XXXXXXX placed in two different partitions) have to
> be configured  if Site B has a requirement of TEHO for 919 area code?
>
>
> *From:* Ki Wi <kiwi.vo...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Qq Ccie <cci...@yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 11:39:36 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
>
> In that case, you have a great time of converting everything to e164. =P
>
> Use called party transformation to strip them into the correct digits at
> the gateway level.
>
> Example : Site A ( local area code 919) ---> calls to local number is
> 8123123
>
> Converted the dialed number to +19198123123
>
> Use a route pattern +.! and send to local route group
>
>
> At each gateway, use called party transformation.
> Match  +1.919! , called transformation mask XXXXXXX for Site A gateway
>
> At Site B, you will strip predot for the other called party transformation.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Qq Ccie < <cci...@yahoo.com>
> cci...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Ahmed for your help.  Yes, I agree that CSS has to be at the line
>> level.
>>
>> However, the assumption is that HQ and BR1 have configured call routing
>> via Standard Local Route Group.  When logged in to EM service, the user
>> would not be able to use his original local gateway because the current
>> local gateway is based on Device Pool settings.  As a result, his local/long
>> distance call might not be correct.  Any suggestion?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Ahmed Ellboudy < <ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com>
>> ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com>
>> *To:* Qq Ccie < <cci...@yahoo.com>cci...@yahoo.com>;
>> <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 1:53:46 PM
>> *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route
>> Group
>>
>>  Hi,
>> I think you need to use Line device approach rule which will solve it by
>> open every calls types local/national and international and makes the EM to
>> limit your access,refer to the SRND in this point
>>
>>
>>  Thanks & Regards;
>>  Ahmed Mahmoud Ellboudy
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* <ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com on behalf of Qq Ccie
>> *Sent:* Sun 6/5/2011 6:31 PM
>> *To:* <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
>>
>>
>>  Anyone has any thoughts of the interaction between Extension Mobility
>> and Local Route Group?  Assuming HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via
>> Local Route Group.  Any suggestions?
>>
>> Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is
>> confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received
>> this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
>> immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this
>> message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special,
>> indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of
>> this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus
>> being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily
>> those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the
>> sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or
>> destroy the original message.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit <http://www.ipexpert.com>www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit <http://www.ipexpert.com>www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to