are your MTPs registered and configured as rsvp under dspfarm profile? if so can you send over your full ios configs
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:20 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com > wrote: > Yes, the DPs are assigned correctly. > > calls are successfully completed, but the RSVP is not rejecting the number > of calls when they exceed the configured max value. > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Do you have the locations in your Device pool and the proper device >> pool assigned to the GW? >> >> RC >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com> >> *To:* Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com> >> *Cc:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >> *Sent:* Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay >> >> Yes, Sure, >> >> Mandatory (Video Desired) >> >> But still no success :( >> >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Is the setting set to mandatory under location in CUCM? >> >> Randall >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com> >> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> *Sent:* Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:29 AM >> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay >> >> >> hello, everyone. >> >> I have several questions about the QoS: >> >> 1) As I know, the Frame Relay Fragment Size must be always calculated >> based on the Interfaces Access Rate? Am I right? And when using the Auto >> QoS on Frame Relay Subinteface, it will calculate the Framgent Size based >> on the "bandwidth" command under the Subinterface, and then we have to >> manually correct the Fragment Size, so that it will be based on the Access >> Rate and not on the Bandwidth of an interface, am I right? >> >> 2) When configuring the CUCM RSVP CAC, we have to configure the "ip >> rsvp bandwidth" command under the Frame Relay DLCI interface, and also >> configure the RSVP MTPs on the Routers. >> Each G729 call for RSVP is allocating 40 kbps, and for G711 96 kbps. >> But now look, I have an issue with the "ip rsvp bandwidth" command: >> >> I have configured the "ip rsvp bandwidth 40" under the Frame Relay DLCI >> (Subinterface), so that I have to have only 1 G729 call, and all other >> calls should be rejected (Not reserved). >> But my routers are still reserving more and more bandwidth for subsequent >> calls. RSVP is not rejecting calls, even if I configure the "ip rsvp >> bandwidth 10" command, the calls are still traversing and are not rejected. >> >> I have also added the following command: >> >> ip rsvp policy preempt >> >> interface Serial0/3/0.1 point-to-point >> frame-relay interface-dlci 101 >> ip rsvp bandwidth 40 >> ip rsvp data-packet classification none >> ip rsvp resource-provider none >> >> But still not succes, even 5 G729 calls are reserved and not rejected. I >> cannot understand why is it so? The debugs of RSVP does not show anything >> interesing, they are just saying that the RSVP reservation has been >> succesfull for each call. >> Maybe it is an IOS BUG? >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
