Randall I had the same exact problem with New Lab 1, after I ran the SQL command from the cucm cli, This fixed the not showing of the IPCC extension field on my cucm enduser page, but after an hour or so of reverting, resyncing uccx I never got rmjtapi to show in CUCM as an application user. I tried adding it manually into CUCM , and then resyncing UCCX, still ng. Finally moved on.
Sent from my iPad On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:13 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com> wrote: > Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Pradeep Kumar Sharma) > 2. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Edgar Feliz) > 3. Re: CUCM/UCCX Intergration (Edgar Feliz) > 4. Re: ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable (Edgar Feliz) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:02:29 +0530 > From: Pradeep Kumar Sharma <sonu.netwo...@gmail.com> > To: CCIEVoiceKP <ccievoic...@gmail.com> > Cc: Online Study <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration > Message-ID: > <CALWZLGczqjzTX0jq-JEOGOLG=jW+=v9epdffuxzk5wj5avs...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > It seems your UCCX server is not integrated properly with CUCM. > > Use http://ccie-musketeers.blogspot.com/search/label/UCCX and fix it. > > -SONU- > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:37 PM, CCIEVoiceKP <ccievoic...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Have you re-syched the data yet? Subsystems --> Unified CM Telephony --> >> Data Resync >> >> KP >> >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> HI, >>> I am working on the New Lab 1 UCCX portion. I am suppose to add an UCCX >>> extension to each user page, but the field to add the UCCX exntension is >>> not there. I also did not see a "rmjtapi" user in CUCM. This is the user in >>> the intergration page on UCCX. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Randall >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111127/4a72770d/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 08:36:53 -0500 > From: Edgar Feliz <ejzi...@gmail.com> > To: CCIEVoiceKP <ccievoic...@gmail.com> > Cc: Online Study <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration > Message-ID: > <cabxks5qfl_jbyttuxstdw9+vxw0z-w0_8-fpebwtxackx_u...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Run this command on the CUCM Pub you do NOT have to reboot. > > run sql update processconfig set paramvalue="T" where paramname like > '%nstalled%' > > E > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:07 AM, CCIEVoiceKP <ccievoic...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Have you re-syched the data yet? Subsystems --> Unified CM Telephony --> >> Data Resync >> >> KP >> >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> HI, >>> I am working on the New Lab 1 UCCX portion. I am suppose to add an UCCX >>> extension to each user page, but the field to add the UCCX exntension is >>> not there. I also did not see a "rmjtapi" user in CUCM. This is the user in >>> the intergration page on UCCX. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Randall >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111127/f8020f5b/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:33:03 -0500 > From: Edgar Feliz <ejzi...@gmail.com> > To: datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com> > Cc: Online Study <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM/UCCX Intergration > Message-ID: > <cabxks5qvsadvt54ibqovfknsn-dhjocvbog8nxjtomoho60...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > That is not the issue there is something wrong with the way the initial > installations took place and you have to run this command. I have been > working on the first 3 labs from the new 5 7 days straight and it is > happening every time. > > The T flag is not being set and it has nothing to do with resync etc. I > spent 3-4 hours on this and the only thing the works is running this on the > CUCM Pub. > > run sql update processconfig set paramvalue="T" where paramname like > '%nstalled%' > > It sets the flag to "true" > > E > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:50 AM, datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> First you need to integrate UCCX with CUCM fully, meaning that the JTAPI >> and RMCM users must be present in CUCM after successful integration. >> >> Please verify that you have configured the JTAPI and RMCM in UCCX, so that >> it will be replicated in CUCM automatically. >> >> Then make JTAPI resynch. >> >> When all that is done successfully, then you will be able to see the UCCX >> Extension in a Users page. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:07 AM, CCIEVoiceKP <ccievoic...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Have you re-syched the data yet? Subsystems --> Unified CM Telephony --> >>> Data Resync >>> >>> KP >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com>wrote: >>> >>>> HI, >>>> I am working on the New Lab 1 UCCX portion. I am suppose to add an UCCX >>>> extension to each user page, but the field to add the UCCX exntension is >>>> not there. I also did not see a "rmjtapi" user in CUCM. This is the user in >>>> the intergration page on UCCX. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> Randall >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111127/1c0f0107/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:34:21 -0500 > From: Edgar Feliz <ejzi...@gmail.com> > To: Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource > unavailable > Message-ID: > <CABxks5Rnhna0WN4x2fxgZUihEgZe+4X=Yky4-=svjti1pkj...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Bill what lab are you working on? > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, if you are sure it is not a ISDN issue but it appears to be that the >> call is set up >> >> Nov 26 22:10:48.504: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref >> = 0x808D >> Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now availab >> >> you then get >> >> >> Nov 26 22:10:48.548: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 >> callref = 0x008D >> Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable, unspecified >> >> so maybe it is an IOS bug but we don't know what IOS you are running or do >> we know running config or the status of any of your system. >> >> Just guessing here but can you complete any calls over the PSTN >> connection? If so what type of calls are completed? >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:36 AM, datucha123 datucha123 < >> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Bill, if you will take a dipper look at the Logs of ISDN, you will see >>> the the Router send the ISD SETUP message, then received the Procceding and >>> Alerting message. >>> So the Voice port in operating normally. >>> After the Alert message, the IP Side is starting - H245 is going for >>> negotiation, and there is a problem in H323 IP Side, not in ISDN side. >>> >>> And I have already mentioned the Problem description in my earlier post. >>> >>> If there would the DSP issues, then the SETUP message will not be send >>> even. >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Bill Lake <whl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This looks like it could be an ISDN issue: >>>> >>>> Is your voice-port in an active (not shut down) state? >>>> >>>> Do you have the proper DSP resources for your configuration? >>>> >>>> Check these and post your configuration if this is not the issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, datucha123 datucha123 < >>>> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's because of Codec Problem between HQ router and the CUCM. >>>>> >>>>> Now look, as we know, when the CUCM sends the H323 SETUP message to GW, >>>>> the GW, by default, begins the H245 Address announcement on Alert Message, >>>>> and at that point the CUCM and GW have exchanged the H245 message, and the >>>>> GW provides the Ring Back tone. Even when the CUCM is using the Slow >>>>> Start. >>>>> Whereas CUCME can detect CUCM and start the H245 only on Connect >>>>> Message, while the default one idicates h245 address on Alert. CUCME IP >>>>> Phones cannot provide the In Band Ring Back tones, so that CUCM needs >>>>> always the Slow start to CUCME, so that CUCM will provide the Local >>>>> Ringback to its IP Phones until the H245 address is received from CUCME >>>>> (whereas CUCME will send the H245 address On Connect only to CUCM). >>>>> >>>>> Now look, as for you case, you get the error message after the Alerting >>>>> Message. What does happen at that moment? GW sends the Alert message with >>>>> H245 Address (and the TCS OLC negotiation begins). CUCM and GW have some >>>>> problems with Codec negotation, and that's why you get that message. >>>>> >>>>> Try to ensure that you use the correct region to GW, and also the >>>>> correct Codecs (or voice class codec) is configured on the GW. >>>>> >>>>> That's the problem of the Codec mismatch. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Ricardo Palaver < >>>>> ricardo.pala...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Experts!, >>>>>> >>>>>> I 've already gave up to fix the problem below. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am calling from a HQ - phone # to PSTN (BR2) region but call >>>>>> fails and it's returnning me the cause code: 0x80AF. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the Cisco community I found its an IOS bug, so if it is, someone >>>>>> here have already faced the same issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can someone give me any idea on how to fix it ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a zillions !.. have a great weekend all ! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> debug isdn q931 is ON. >>>>>> BR2-RTR# >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.460: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for >>>>>> sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Calling num 2123945001 >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = >>>>>> 0x008D callID = 0x800E switch = primary-net5 interface = User >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref >>>>>> = 0x008D >>>>>> Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 >>>>>> Standard = CCITT >>>>>> Transfer Capability = Speech >>>>>> Transfer Mode = Circuit >>>>>> Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s >>>>>> Channel ID i = 0xA98381 >>>>>> Exclusive, Channel 1 >>>>>> Display i = 'HQ Phone 1' >>>>>> Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2123945001' >>>>>> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown >>>>>> Called Party Number i = 0x80, '32141891' >>>>>> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.500: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 >>>>>> callref = 0x808D >>>>>> Channel ID i = 0xA98381 >>>>>> Exclusive, Channel 1 >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.504: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 >>>>>> callref = 0x808D >>>>>> Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now >>>>>> availab >>>>>> BR2-RTR#le >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.548: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 >>>>>> callref = 0x008D >>>>>> Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable, unspecified >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.560: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 >>>>>> callref = 0x808D >>>>>> Nov 26 22:10:48.564: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 >>>>>> callref = 0x008D >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20111127/b9a4eeb5/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CCIE_Voice mailing list > CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > > End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 69, Issue 191 > ******************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email. _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
