*The calling party transformation patterns need to be matched on the pre-RP/RL digits. * ** *Does it goes for CALLED Party as well?*
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Chris Martin <clm.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anytime. I have done the same thing before! > > Chris > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, ccielabrat <ccielab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Chris, >> >> Great catch. >> You were spot on with your advice. >> >> Thanks for correcting my thinking. >> >> I guess it doesn't make sense as I think about it now, but I thought by >> the time the gateway got the call had "left" CUCM and any reference to >> external # mask, etc. wouldn't be relevant. >> So I was trying to get the send the + globalized # to the gw and have it >> trim off the +. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, ccielabrat <ccielab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Chris, >>> >>> I'll look into that now. >>> So , with this in mind, should I be able to "check" the use external # >>> mask within the calling party transformation and then apply a "XXXXXXXXXX" >>> mask? or do I have to match against the 4 digit DN and then prefix the DN >>> in the mask? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Chris Martin <clm.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> What pattern do you have setup for Calling Party Transformations? You >>>> mention you are seeing + Globalized numbers in your isdn q931 debug, this >>>> leads me to believe you have a RP/RL with External Number Mask applied. My >>>> guess is you are trying to match on the Globalized Calling numbers in your >>>> calling transformation patterns. >>>> >>>> The calling party transformation patterns need to be matched on the >>>> pre-RP/RL digits. IE: 5XXX not +12127775XXX. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:13 PM, ccielabrat <ccielab...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> To All, >>>>> >>>>> I just needed to check to see if anyone knows about a problem using >>>>> calling party transformations at the gateway level. >>>>> >>>>> I have a setup where I am send a fully globalized called and calling # >>>>> to my gateways. >>>>> I wanted to make all needed adjustments just before it goes to the >>>>> PSTN. >>>>> >>>>> My transformation CSS's are setup properly and I can adjust the called >>>>> party number >>>>> but the calling party number will not adjust according to the calling >>>>> party xform pattern. >>>>> >>>>> I can see the calling number is getting to the gw in "+" format based >>>>> on what I see in Q.931 on the router. >>>>> >>>>> Anybody experience this behavior? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
