Randall I sent it to your personal email
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:00 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 68
Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Bootcamp Lab 1 UCCX solution (Randall Crumm)
2. Re: CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt (George Goglidze)
3. Re: CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt (Bruno Nonogaki)
4. MMoH RSVP CAC (datucha123 datucha123)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:45:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com>
To: Online Study <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Bootcamp Lab 1 UCCX solution
Message-ID:
<1328939155.6805.yahoomail...@web164618.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Does anyone have a solution for the UCCX script portion? I do not see it in the
download and it is not in the DSG.
?
Thanks
Cheers,
Randall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120210/1f092808/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:13:21 +0100
From: George Goglidze <gogli...@gmail.com>
To: Bruno Nonogaki <brun...@gmail.com>
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt
Message-ID:
<CA+Dn5iM_k=ixh75qjHu1nt_oyVuKk=skukyda8l6jdqmrpw...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Bruno,
The command "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt true" is only when there
is a call with that dial-peer as incoming leg, and then going out of another
dial-peer.
basically when you have call coming from somewhere else like CUCM, then
choosing as incoming leg dialpeer one with that command, and going out by
another dialpeer that has a pattern that is blocked.
If you want to allow one patter, it should be NOT included in the blocked
patter range. in another words, you will have to be more exact on your block
pattern.
for example, don't put just 0, put 0........
hope this helps,
Cheers,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Bruno Nonogaki <brun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was making some tests with After-Hours Call Blocking on CME, for example:
>
> telephony-services
> after-hours block pattern 1 0 (blocks pattern 0) after-hours day sun
> start 10:00 11:00
>
> And then I had my dial-peers:
>
> dial-peer voice 1 voip
> destination-pattern 0190
> session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
> destination-pattern 000T
> session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>
> This is just an example... And the call block was working fine. When I
> dialed 0 on my phone, I got the fast busy tone...
> I could configure an exempt on ephone with a PIN (after-hours exempt),
> and even an override-code (after-hours override-code XXXX).
>
> But I am trying to configure an exempt for my dial-peer as well. Let's
> suppose I don't want the dial-peer 1 to be blocked, never, because it
> is an emergency number.
> I tried to configure the line "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt
> true" on this dial-peer, according to CME documentation. But it is
> still getting blocked.
>
> Does anyone know how can I use this command to configure a dial-peer
> exempt for Call Blocking?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bruno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120211/52523ca8/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:30:03 -0200
From: Bruno Nonogaki <brun...@gmail.com>
To: George Goglidze <gogli...@gmail.com>
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Call Blocking - Dial Peer Exempt
Message-ID:
<CAP_RLdXvY3oFmMUg3h=fk02lnxgjahxknjnlgjtb0-cb9se...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello George,
Thank you very much for your answer! :)
Rgds,
Bruno
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:13 AM, George Goglidze <gogli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> The command "paramspace callsetup after-hours-exempt true" is only
> when there is a call with that dial-peer as incoming leg, and then
> going out of another dial-peer.
> basically when you have call coming from somewhere else like CUCM,
> then choosing as incoming leg dialpeer one with that command, and
> going out by another dialpeer that has a pattern that is blocked.
>
> If you want to allow one patter, it should be NOT included in the
> blocked patter range. in another words, you will have to be more
> exact on your block pattern.
> for example, don't put just 0, put 0........
>
> hope this helps,
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Bruno Nonogaki <brun...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I was making some tests with After-Hours Call Blocking on CME, for
>> example:
>>
>> telephony-services
>> after-hours block pattern 1 0 (blocks pattern 0) after-hours day
>> sun start 10:00 11:00
>>
>> And then I had my dial-peers:
>>
>> dial-peer voice 1 voip
>> destination-pattern 0190
>> session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>>
>> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>> destination-pattern 000T
>> session target ipv4:x.x.x.x
>>
>> This is just an example... And the call block was working fine. When
>> I dialed 0 on my phone, I got the fast busy tone...
>> I could configure an exempt on ephone with a PIN (after-hours
>> exempt), and even an override-code (after-hours override-code XXXX).
>>
>> But I am trying to configure an exempt for my dial-peer as well.
>> Let's suppose I don't want the dial-peer 1 to be blocked, never,
>> because it is an emergency number.
>> I tried to configure the line "paramspace callsetup
>> after-hours-exempt true" on this dial-peer, according to CME
>> documentation. But it is still getting blocked.
>>
>> Does anyone know how can I use this command to configure a dial-peer
>> exempt for Call Blocking?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120211/fb855926/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:59:06 +0400
From: datucha123 datucha123 <datucha...@gmail.com>
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MMoH RSVP CAC
Message-ID:
<CAPZ0ugMBStqqeeGKur=p3MHf4rgSzx1+9yz8=fnuzbuc+z0...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
As we know, the Multicast MoH is not counted against the CAC bandwidth, but the
Priority Queue does. So when the Branch devices (IP Phones/Gateway) are using
the MMoH sourced from the HQ CUCM Servers, we need to take the MoH bandwidth
into account for LLQ Priority queue, but not for CAC, as mutlicast is not
counted for RSVP CAC. And at some point we may get the Oversubscriptio for the
WAN link.
Well, that's ok, but how much bandwidth must be taken into acount for LLQ
Priority queue for Multicast MoH? I mean if using G729 MMoH, then how much MMoH
sessions we have to consider when configuring the LLQ Priority Queue?
What it is based on? Becuase we do not know, how much Holds will be at the same
time on the Branch site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120211/124b9a46/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CCIE_Voice mailing list
CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 72, Issue 68
******************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended
for the sole use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Black Box
Corporation reserves the right to scan all e-mail traffic for restricted
content and to monitor all e-mail in general. If you are not the intended
recipient or you have received this email in error, any use, dissemination or
forwarding of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this email.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
