Thanks for confirming that! Presumably your rerouting calling search space on the RDP uses a route pattern that points to a RL containing the Standard Local Route Group, which would explain it routing via the local gateway.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Jason Murray <murr...@usa.com> wrote: > > Phew at least I'm not the only one :) I am still working in the lab so I > tried unchecking the Mobile Phone checkbox and it still forwards out as > calling the remote destination. I just find it strange as well on how it > even knows to send that called number to the HQ gateway. I can't seem to > find a route pattern or anything that tells it to do that. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Kevin Spicer > > Sent: 04/12/12 01:09 PM > > To: Jason Murray > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and RDP > > Hi Jason, > > I've also observed the same behaviour. The only thing I've found in > documentation relating to this is the following from the 8.5 features and > services guide... > *"Automatic Alternate Routing ** * > > *Prior to the implementation of this interaction, if a desk phone was > configured for Automatic Alternate Routing (AAR) and the desk phone was > configured with a mobile phone as a remote destination, the AAR feature did > not get triggered for calls to the remote destination if the > out-of-bandwidth condition applied. * > ** > > *Cisco Unified Mobility now supports Automatic Alternate Routing (AAR) as > follows: * > ** > > *•If a rejection occurs due to lack of bandwidth for the location-based > service, the rejection triggers AAR for any device that is configured for > AAR. * > ** > > *•If a rejection occurs based on Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP), > however, AAR does not get triggered for calls to remote destinations.*" > > > > This leads me to believe that we cannot expect this to work in 7.0. > Reading this now I just noticed it says 'with a mobile phone as a remote > destination'- so I wonder if unchecking the mobile phone checkbox would > make it work, can anyone confirm? > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jason Murray <murr...@usa.com> wrote: > >> Ok so I have a weird one for you. I'm in lab 7 vol 2 testing aar from HQ >> phone >> 2 to BR2 Phone 2. I bring down the bandwidth to 23. AAR works great to >> 3001, and cue 3600. When I call 3002 it sits there for a moment and then >> just fails. I look at the HQ gw and its sending number +447976852817. >> I finally figure out through playing around with it that its the remote >> destination number for BR2 Phone 2. If I change the RD like 2815 or >> something the HQ gw shows that number. So I end up disassociating the >> remote destinations from line 3002 and AAR works great but of course that >> breaks mobile connect. So when i put that association back it breaks aar >> to 3002 again. >> >> So has anybody seen something crazy like this. Not sure where to even >> start working on this because I though AAR would use the External Number >> Mask of the phone not send it to a remote destination number. THoughts? >> >> >> Thanks >> Jason >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
