Just making sure I don't run into any issues/caveats. I know there is more than one way to skin a cat. That being said. If I have a dial-peer where I want to include the dialed digits plus prefix additional am I hurting myself or walking into a later problem if I use forward digits all along with the prefix instead of no digit strip plus the prefix. In the solution guide it uses no digit strip but I am in the habit of forward digits all – I have not seen any issues but just looking for potential scenarios.
Example dial-peer voice 2002 pots translation-profile outgoing 4to164 destination-pattern 3... port 0/0/0:15 forward-digits all prefix 001408387 Versus dial-peer voice 2002 pots translation-profile outgoing 4to164 destination-pattern 3... port 0/0/0:15 No digit-strip prefix 001408387 [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo01.jpg] Steven Sarrick SYSTEMS ENGINEER.SALES ssarr...@cisco.com<mailto:ssarr...@cisco.com> Phone: +1 412 237 6338 Mobile: +1 412 480 3861 [Think before you print.] Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
