What model phone?   As I recall this doesn't work correctly on 7940/60
On 22 Sep 2012 02:48, "virajith" <vir...@rediffmail.com> wrote:

> hi Abel,
>
> What I am trying to say is without applying the calling party
> transformation  to the phone . The gateway is able to add the +1408 but
> when I  am applying the calling party transformation to the phone.
>
> In the ringing state it shows 7 digits (which is correct)  . However in
> the missed calls instead of storing  +14085151111  it only stores
> 5151111.
>
> Let me know if any other change in config is there?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Vir
>
>
>
>
> From: "Abel ..." <midga...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:05:59
> To: Nicolas MICHEL <mcl.nico...@gmail.com>
> Cc: vir...@rediffmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number
> localization
> Try it without the calling party transformation applied in the phone, in
> this way you can be sure if the gateway is adding the +1408 to the 7 digits
> ANI. If everything is ok you should see the full E.164 number in the screen
> and also in the missed calls. If everything is ok check you transformation,
> the one applied to the phone.
>
> Abel Mateo
> CCIE #28546 - R&S/Voice
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas MICHEL <mcl.nico...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Then your gateway does not invoke the Callin party Transformation pattern
>  (Maybe a CSS/PT problem)****
>
> ** **
>
> You should also have a Translation Pattern that strips \+1408  on the
> phone or on the device pool****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Nic****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* vir...@rediffmail.com [mailto:vir...@rediffmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 21, 2012 2:30 PM
> *To:* Nicolas MICHEL
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number
> localization****
>
> ** **
>
> hi Nicolas,
>
> I followed the video . However here are the steps I followed:
>
> 1) add the prefix to the gateway endpoint ( make sure to note the type -
> say subscriber ) eg. +1408
>
> 2) create a specific css and partition for predot numbers
>
> 3)add a calling party transformation  with predot strip eg .
> \+1408.XXXXXXX
>
> 4) go to phone and uncheck the Use DP calling party css and add the
> calling party css that was created in step 2
>
> Now here is the problem for which I am confused if I call from pstn to ip
> phone  that is from 5151111 to 2022001 .
> I see the seven digit caller id ( that is 5151111 -- which is expected )
> however when I go to the phone and check missed calls instead of the number
> getting stored as +14081515111  it gets stored as just 5151111. Why does
> this happen is my config wrong? Please help.
>
> Regards,
> Vir
>
>
>
>
> From: Nicolas MICHEL <mcl.nico...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:45:34
> To: "'virajith '" <vir...@rediffmail.com>, <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> >
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number
> localization****
>
> Hi****
>
>  ****
>
> Watch IP Expert + dialing lecture from Vik.****
>
>  ****
>
> Best way to understand it****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *virajith
> *Sent:* Friday, September 21, 2012 12:28 PM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need to understand + dialing and number
> localization****
>
>  ****
>
> hi guys,
>
> I need to understand or have a simple way of understanding + dialing and
> number localization. Can anyone help me wiht this?
>
> Thanks,
> Vir
>
>
>
> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> Sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:29:38
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 79, Issue 65
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>    ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinestudylist.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccie_voice&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern
>      (Chrysostomos Christofi)
>   2. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern
>      (Chrysostomos Christofi)
>   3. Re: Internal numbers overlap with one route   pattern (Kevin Spicer)
>   4. Re: WAN QoS questions (Krishna)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:15:37 +0000
> From: Chrysostomos Christofi <ch.christ...@logicom.net>
> To: "Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"
>    <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route
>    pattern
> Message-ID:
>    <f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi guys
>
> Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal
> numbers?(extensions)
>
> I believe no but what is your opinion
>
> Scenario:
>
>
> route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XXXXXX (local numbers)
>
> internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions)
>
> when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit
> timeout
>
> can this be fixed?
>
> They don't want to use access code for PSTN calls
>
> Regards
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/ba021d2e/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:48 +0000
> From: Chrysostomos Christofi <ch.christ...@logicom.net>
> To: Kevin Spicer <ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk>
> Cc: "Online Study \(ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com\)"
>    <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one
>    route pattern
> Message-ID:
>    <f3a446ed84ff9449b29f801927620de783ea9...@exmbxsrv2.lgcom.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
>
> Hi Kevin
>
> The delay is exactly the same
> Without translation pattern is 5 seconds.
> With translation pattern is again 5 seconds
> In the translation  I checked also the urgent priority
>
> From: kevinspice...@gmail.com [mailto:kevinspice...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Kevin Spicer
> Sent: ??????, 20 ??????????? 2012 3:31 ??
> To: Chrysostomos Christofi
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route
> pattern
>
>
> Try a translation pattern XXXX# with a trailing hash discard.
> On 20 Sep 2012 13:28, "Chrysostomos Christofi" <ch.christ...@logicom.net
> <mailto:ch.christ...@logicom.net>> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal
> numbers?(extensions)
>
> I believe no but what is your opinion
>
> Scenario:
>
>
> route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XXXXXX (local numbers)
>
> internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions)
>
> when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit
> timeout
>
> can this be fixed?
>
> They don't want to use access code for PSTN calls
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit 
> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.ipexpert.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> <http://www.ipexpert.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ipexpert.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> >
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> <http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.PlatinumPlacement.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/b17fad1a/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:02:21 +0100
> From: Kevin Spicer <ke...@kevinspicer.co.uk>
> To: Chrysostomos Christofi <ch.christ...@logicom.net>
> Cc: "Online Study \(ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com\)"
>    <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one
>    route   pattern
> Message-ID:
>    <CAF2gGOTKcVDt+=twnfqj8bv1nfrnnssuu9etnexurdw_w5b...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7"
>
> I think you need to make sure that the CSS of the translation contains only
> the partitions with the phones in, but not the route patterns.
> On 20 Sep 2012 13:45, "Chrysostomos Christofi" <ch.christ...@logicom.net>
> wrote:
>
> >  Hi Kevin****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > The delay is exactly the same ****
> >
> > Without translation pattern is 5 seconds.****
> >
> > With translation pattern is again 5 seconds****
> >
> > In the translation  I checked also the urgent priority****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > *From:* kevinspice...@gmail.com [mailto:kevinspice...@gmail.com] *On
> > Behalf Of *Kevin Spicer
> > *Sent:* ??????, 20 ??????????? 2012 3:31 ??
> > *To:* Chrysostomos Christofi
> > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route
> > pattern****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Try a translation pattern XXXX# with a trailing hash discard.****
> >
> > On 20 Sep 2012 13:28, "Chrysostomos Christofi" <ch.christ...@logicom.net
> >
> > wrote:****
> >
> > Hi guys****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> > Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal
> > numbers?(extensions)****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> > I believe no but what is your opinion****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> > Scenario:****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> > route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XXXXXX (local
> numbers)
> > ****
> >
> > internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions)****
> >
> > when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit
> > timeout****
> >
> > can this be fixed?****
> >
> > They don?t want to use access code for PSTN calls****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> > Regards****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> >  ****
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit 
> > www.ipexpert.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.ipexpert.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> ****
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/fc80bb76/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Krishna <vinayak_...@yahoo.com>
> To: Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com>,   Online Study
>    <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS questions
> Message-ID:
>    <1348156730.25987.yahoomail...@web164603.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> 1.) it depends, for example if this is a router with switch module in it
> i.e. BR1, i would not use trust since the marking will be done with acls by
> auto qos voip
>
> 2.) it depends, if you're told to use class based compression then you
> have to use compression header ip rtp in the policy-map otherwise you can
> leave as in the interface-dlci
>
> 3.) its once again you've to clarify with proctor.. for a full T1 i have
> never 95% bandwidth so far ... the bandwidth for <=768 i have seen using
> 95% of the bandwidth speed.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Randall Crumm <rrcr...@yahoo.com>
> To: Online Study <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:30 AM
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS questions
>
>
> Hello experts,
>
> I have some questions on WAN QoS.
>
> 1. If not?explicitly?not told to TRUST, is it better to use trust or not?
>
>
> 2. If using FRF.12 and told do use compression, does it matter if it is on
> the WAN DLCI or the policy map? Always in the policy map?
>
> 2A If told to use class-based compression then do it on the policy map.
>
>
> 3. SA<->SB is 768KB, SA<->SC is 1536KB.
> When applying the 95% of CIR rule do we need to also apply to SC when
> 1536KB?
>
>
> 3A - What bandwidth threshold would we not use the 95% rule, above 768KB?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Randall
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit 
> www.ipexpert.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.ipexpert.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20120920/de449c39/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCIE_Voice mailing list
> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice<http://www.rediffmail.com/cgi-bin/red.cgi?account_type=1&red=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinestudylist.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fccie_voice&isImage=0&BlockImage=0&rediffng=0>
>
>
> End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 79, Issue 65
> ******************************************
>
> [image: Description: Image removed by sender. Description: Image removed
> by 
> sender.]<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>
> ****
>
> Follow *Rediff Deal ho 
> jaye!<http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=rediffmailsignature___&cmp=signature&lnk=rediffmailsignature&newservice=deals>
> * to get exciting offers in your city everyday.****
>
>  ****
>
>
> [image: Description: Image removed by 
> sender.]<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>
> ****
>
> Follow *Rediff Deal ho 
> jaye!<http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=rediffmailsignature___&cmp=signature&lnk=rediffmailsignature&newservice=deals>
> * to get exciting offers in your city everyday.****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
>
>
> <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>
> Follow *Rediff Deal ho 
> jaye!<http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=rediffmailsignature___&cmp=signature&lnk=rediffmailsignature&newservice=deals>
> * to get exciting offers in your city everyday.
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to