Singh, I am not sure how to answer question #1. cBarge requires a hardware conference bridge so I don't know how one would compare/contrast the two. If you are asking about cBarge vs. ad-hoc or MML conferencing then the main difference is who initiates the conference. With cBarge a party with a shared line appearance initiates the conference by barging in on an active call. With adhoc a person already involved in the call is pulling another party in. With MML, a person initiates the bridge that others can dial into.
Once configured, you would stand up an active call on the shared line and then barge in from the phone not involved in the call. -BIll -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 2:37 AM, singh wrote: > hi Guys, > > I am configuring cbarge on CME. > > > 1) Could anyone tell me what are Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware > conference bridge? > > 2) Also how do I test cbarge once configured? > > > -singh > > > > > > Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
