We are running fully patched 6.0; but unfortunately I think I found
the issue: http://www.developsense.com/testing/VSSDefects.html >
"Automation API Issues". It appears that this is expected behavior for
VSS; so I'll need to develop a workaround to handle searching to the
additions and removals to incorporate those into our unit testing
process. Surprisingly, I did some pretty intense searching before
finding any resources that address this issue. Thank you both for your
help,

Jen

On Jun 4, 12:09 pm, "Phil Sayers" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Make sure your VSS is fully patched.
>
> What vss version are you running?  6.0?  2005?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>
> Behalf Of Jen B.
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:20 AM
> To: ccnet-user
> Subject: [ccnet-user] Re: Modification History Issue with VSS
>
> That's exactly what I was afraid of. Maybe I can get into the code to
> see the command line CC is using to query VSS for modifications to see
> if I can replicate the error outside of Cruise Control; and then see
> if there are any VSS workarounds available to circumvent the problem.
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Jen
>
> On Jun 3, 5:18 pm, Craig Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Jen,
>
> > I've had a quick look at the code. It appears that all CC.NET does is
> > split the path name provided by VSS into folder and file names.
>
> > This means the problem is VSS is not returning the full path and
> > unfortunately I don't think we can do much about that.
>
> > Maybe one of the devs with VSS can take a look at this (I use SVN so I
> > can't debug it for you).
>
> > Craig
>
> > On Jun 4, 6:22 am, "Jen B." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I'm using the ModificationWriter task to collect a list of changes
> > > from Visual SourceSafe to use for unit testing / validation. This
> > > process works great if the modification type is "Checked In"; however,
> > > when the modification is an addition or deletion, the "FolderName"
> > > information doesn't include the full path to the file. This is
> > > problematic because of the massive number of files we are managing;
> > > there is no way to identify where the file lives in the directory
> > > structure without the explicit path. Does anyone have any ideas to
> > > workaround this problem? Thanks!
>
> > > Jen- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to