These options look interesting for reducing the number of emails and
general noise made by CruiseControl while the SVN server is down.
They don't however look like they'll help the project turn back to
green as soon as SVN is back.


2009/8/3 Daniel Nauck <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> have you tested the new options [1]:
>
> - maxSourceControlRetries
> - stopProjectOnReachingMaxSourceControlRetries
> - sourceControlErrorHandling
>
> of CCNet 1.4.4 ?
>
> Daniel
>
> [1]
> http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Project+Configuration+Block
>
>
> Lennart Wagner schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have the very same problem. It would be nice if I didn't need to
>> force the build every couple of days.
>>
>> I am writing this to show the developers that there is demand for a
>> solution to this problem.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Lennart
>>
>> Paul Richards schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Our SVN server is flakey and we have discovered that this doesn't mix
>>> well with CruiseControl.NET (v1.4.4.83).
>>>
>>> Our project (which only has a default interval trigger
>>> "<intervalTrigger />") will be green before the SVN server dies.  The
>>> SVN server then dies and subsequently CruiseControl flags the project
>>> as red with a suitable error about the SVN server.
>>>
>>> Later when the SVN server comes back CruiseControl resumes checking
>>> for updates to the project, sees there are no changes waiting to be
>>> tested, but doesn't put the project back to green.
>>>
>>> So after the SVN server comes back online we have to manually force
>>> all the projects which are falsely reporting red (or make a dummy
>>> commit).
>>>
>>>
>>> It makes sense that CruiseControl marks the project as red while the
>>> SVN server is down, but it would be very handy if the status went back
>>> to green once the SVN server is back and there are no modifications to
>>> build (assuming of course the project was green prior to the outage).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>



-- 
Paul Richards

Reply via email to