You are not helping.... Where do you see that error?

Normally you have a file 'ccnet.log' under <ccnet foder>\server. Look
on that file and try find any error messages (do NOT post the whole
file here..)
How do you run ccnet? fom command line or as a service ?

florin

On Oct 27, 10:37 am, Petal Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Florin,
>
> Sorry I don't know where I can find the crash dump file. Any information
> about it? The crash shows general information like "CC.Net Console Runner
> has encountered a problem and needs to close. ..."
>
> I suspected the crash is due to that it runs out of memory since the build
> log informaitonis too large (around 70M). I have workarounded by suppressing
> some log information and so far it works fine.
>
> But may know what's the limitation size for the build log?
>
> Thanks,
> Petal
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:56 PM, florin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Can you also define this 'crash'? It is like going to the doctor, it
> > is not enough to tell that it hurts, you also have to way what & when.
>
> > Do not expect help unless you provide minimum information on this and
> > the CPU speed does not qualify as useful information.
>
> > florin
>
> > On Oct 23, 4:24 am, Petal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > We have two machines runing the same task which requires to delete and
> > > pull a lot of files from perforce (this means CCNet needs to collect a
> > > lot of log information at runtime, and usually the size of the
> > > buildlog is around 70M). The problem is that one machine is quite
> > > stable but the other often got crash. I compared the hardware
> > > configuration between the two machines:
>
> > > stable machine:
> > > Intel(R) COre(TM)2 Quad CPU
> > > Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
> > > 2.83GHz, 3.25GB of RAM
>
> > > unstable machine:
> > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
> > > W3520 @ 2.67GHz
> > > 2.67GHz, 3.00GB of RAM
>
> > > I am not sure whether the issue comes this. But it is the only
> > > difference I can found between the two machines since the error report
> > > doesn't give me more meaningful information.
>
> > > Anybody else encountered the same problem before?
>
> > > Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
>
> > > Thanks,
> > > petal

Reply via email to