I suppose the good thing with this is that it does open the door (ish) to WF to control the build process.
On Apr 6, 11:02 am, "Craig & Sammi Sutherland" <[email protected]> wrote: > To answer the second question - yes! Hence it will be for a future (post 1.6 > release). > > The first question is a lot more complex, but basically it overcomes some of > the limitations of XML serialisation that NetReflector was designed for > (i.e. no dynamic discovery). However it does it with a slightly different > syntax. If you are similar with Silverlight, WPF or WF you will have seen > some XAML. > > Craig > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Cedric > Sent: Tuesday, 6 April 2010 9:44 p.m. > To: ccnet-user > Subject: [ccnet-user] Re: NetReflector > > I've not looked at XamlServices yet. What good stuff does this give > you and could this mean a breaking change to the config files? > > On Apr 6, 10:10 am, "Craig & Sammi Sutherland" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Basically - for dynamic discovery of the types. In .NET 1.0 (when CC.NET > was > > originally started) the types had to be hard-coded for XmlSerializer to > use > > them, which meant that it was hard to add new tasks, triggers, etc. > > > We are looking at using XamlServices to handle the > > serialisation/deserialisation, but it will probably be a while until we > swap > > over (it requires .NET 4.0, and since we support CC.NET on Mono we need to > > wait until Mono can handle XamlServices.) > > > If you have any issues with NetReflector (and I know I have run into a few > > of them), post them here or on the developers' group and we'll see if we > can > > answer them. > > > Craig > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > Behalf Of Cedric > > Sent: Tuesday, 6 April 2010 8:40 p.m. > > To: ccnet-user > > Subject: [ccnet-user] NetReflector > > > Chaps, > > > I was looking at the source for this project as i have a couple of > > ideas that i'm mulling over and i was wondering why ccnet uses > > NetReflector and not the built in XmlSerializer? > > > Regards, > > > Cedric > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.- Hide quoted text > - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
