The thing is that the application is building fine - but it requires the Web Deployment Project extension and this is the part that I apparently need the SDK for. 4GB seems like a lot just to get that functionality!
====================== Dave Carson BEng (hons) There are 10 types of people.. Those who understand Binary, and those who don't..... ====================== On 27 May 2010 20:04, Cedric JP. Brasey <[email protected]>wrote: > Dilbertdave, > > My previous experiences with the sdk from ms is that it can take upto > 4gb to install. But it really does depend on how much you want to > install. The installer itself is quite small. > > Good luck! > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 27 May 2010, at 19:45, "DilbertDave" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We are currently moving to Visual Studio 2010 and migrating our > > existing VS2005/.NET2.0 projects to .NET3.5. > > > > I committed an updated ASP.NET <http://asp.net/> projects to SVN and > then modified my > > NAnt scripts to call MSBuild 3.5 and was surprised to see the normal > > CI build succeed! > > > > However I was not so lucky when I attempted to perform a 'deployment' > > build, i.e. building the application and deploying to the test IIS > > server. > > Firstly, although I was building to .NET 3.5 MSBuild 3.5 was not going > > to do the job and after researching the error message (which escapes > > me right now) I found that I had to install .NET 4.0. That's fine, > > it's the base for VS2010 and it will still build to .NET 3.5, no > > problems there. > > So with .NET4.0 installed I thought I was home and free but now I get > > errors relating to aspnet_merge being missing! A quick Google search > > and it looks like I need to install the Windows SDK - which can > > apparently consume 4GB..!!!! I don't have that amount of free space on > > the build server! > > > > So the question is: what do I need to install on the build server > > (which will soon be running CCNet 1.5) in order to build solutions > > developed in VS2010? > > > > Somebody out there must have done it and I won't be the only one who > > will appreciate a few pointers. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > ]-----------------------------------------------[ > This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may also be legally > privileged. > They are intended solely for the intended addressee. If you are not the > addressee > please e-mail it back to the sender and then immediately, permanently > delete it. Do > not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it. This e-mail > may be monitored > by Planet Side Limited in accordance with current regulations. This > footnote also > confirms that this e-mail message has been swept for the presence of > computer viruses > currently known to Planet Side Limited. However, the recipient is > responsible for virus-checking > before opening this message and any attachment. Unless expressly stated to > the contrary, > any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and > may not > necessarily reflect the views of Planet Side Limited. > > http://www.planet-side.co.uk > >
