great thanks :) it looks like a much better solution than the old one - but it might have been better to offer it as a new task like "AdvancedPackager" or something. //östen
On Jan 31, 9:19 am, "Craig & Sammi Sutherland" <[email protected]> wrote: > And the documentation has been updated for the package - it was not being > included in the automatic updates so I have manually updated it. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of östen petersson > Sent: Monday, 31 January 2011 8:18 p.m. > To: ccnet-user > Subject: [ccnet-user] there must be some change to the exec task in 1.6 > > so the below snippets has worked in 1.4 and 1.6 I did an upgrade > before the weekend and now all projects running fxcop is failing > > the message is as always with fxcop cryptic: > > <buildresults> > <message level="Error">Argument specified without a corresponding > switch : '</message> > <message level="Error">'.</message> > <message level="Error">Type FxCopCmd.exe /? for help on command-line > arguments.</message> > </buildresults> > > <cb:define name="fxcopspecificArgs"> > /file:$(WorkingDirectory)$(MyProject) > \blabla.Common.Wcf.CommitteeServiceCore.dll > /directory:$(WorkingDirectory)$(MyProject)\Test\bin\Build\ > /out:"$(ServerDictionary)$(MyProject)$(myProjectType)\Artifacts > \fxcopreport.xml" > /project:"$(WorkingDirectory)config_filer\fxcopfiles > \basic.FxCop" > /dictionary:"$(fxcopDictionary)" > /quiet > /timeout:90 > /ignoregeneratedcode > /ignoreinvalidtargets > /forceoutput > /verbose > /searchgac > </cb:define> > > <exec> > <description>............running fxcop............</ > description> > <executable>D:\ccnet_tools\fxcop\FxCopCmd.exe</executable> > <buildArgs> > <cb:fxcopspecificArgs/> > </buildArgs> > <buildTimeoutSeconds>900</buildTimeoutSeconds> > </exec> > > since my brain shuts down every time I stare at xml I have a hard time > figuring out whats wrong - anyone with a tip? > > also you are going to update the documentation on the packager syntax > right?
