***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Hi,

I was following this discussion with interest since I am desperately looking 
for a program that calculates molecular surfaces. As I understand it 'areaimol' 
or 'surface' cannot calculate this because they do not calculate completely the 
surface described by the locus of the inward-facing probe sphere (the reentrant 
surface is lacking). Does anyone know if there is a program that calculates 
molecular surfaces and which gives an output per residue?

Erwin  
>
>Thanks all for your helpful replies.
>
>I found the article mentioned very useful,
>
>http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/newsletters/newsletter38/03_surfarea.html
>
>
>My major problems started when I confused the 'contact area' with the
>'area in contact' for a subunit in an oligomer, but now I understand
>that areaimol doesn't compute that directly. It would be really nice if
>the man page for areaimol pointed to the above article.
>
>Cheers,
>Dan.
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> ***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
>> ***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I recently started using 'areaimol' in the CCP4 program suite,
>> 
>> CCP4 5.0
>> AREAIMOL 5.0
>> 30/01/04
>> 
>> I am using default settings to look at 'simple area calculation' of a
>> protein.  The results file has two major sections,
>> 
>> 1) ACCESSIBLE AREAS (for the residue/chain/oligomer)
>> 2) CONTACT AREAS    (for the residue/chain/oligomer)
>> 
>> What is the difference between these two measures? (Are they even related
>> measures, or do they measure different physical properties of the
>> molecule?)
>> 
>> From the manual I read...
>> 
>> "The contact area is defined as the area on the Van der Waals surface of
>> an atom that can be contacted by a sphere of the given probe radius."
>> 
>> but that sounds just like the ASA?
>> 
>> I am a beginner with these concepts, so I don't see how (if at all) the
>> two measures are related, or why two measures are needed.
>> 
>> Thanks for any help,
>> 
>> Dan.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to