I would like to join John Tanner's view and vote for one ccp4bb with a wide variety of topics (one can always use the delete button if a topic doesn't seem interesting enough)!

Best regards,

Dirk.

Tanner, John J. wrote:
***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


I vote for 1 ccp4bb with messages having informative subjects.








-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anastassis Perrakis
Sent: Fri 11/4/2005 6:39 AM
To: Garib Murshudov
Cc: George M. Sheldrick; ccp4bb
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: scope of ccp4bb
 
***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


Dear all,

May I suggest to indeed leave things as they are - not split the bb -  
but then have two 'silent' agreements, which are anyway partially in 
place.

a. To restrain - not constrain - a bit towards the protein handling and 
biochemistry, and attempt to stay out of cloning issues, whenever 
possible and unless its really needed, and when i.e. google 'ligation 
problems' does not give a satisfactory answer.

b. When questions (which must indeed have proper subjects, as they 
mostly do!) are upstream of crystallization, to send the answers to the 
person that asked, and not to everybody. Then the person that asked 
should post one simple summary for update.

	Tassos

On 4 Nov 2005, at 12:44, Garib Murshudov wrote:

  
***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***




I also think that it is important to keep as it is. And that is what 
makes it popular. Everybody finds something useful.  I agree with 
Martyn's
point that subject should be sufficiently clear.

Garib

On 4 Nov 2005, at 13:12, George M. Sheldrick wrote:

    
***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


I vote for keeping a single CCP4bb list. I don't understand all the 
biological stuff but some of the contributions are quite educational.

George

Martyn Winn wrote:
      
Hmmm, I thought this suggestion would come up sooner
or later.
My understanding is that the value people get out
of ccp4bb is that their questions reach the whole
community. Splitting up ccp4bb will dilute that
benefit.
We will never get a service that everyone likes,
but my feeling is that most people are happy most
of the time.
        
-- 
Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-2582


      






  


-- 

****************************************
Dirk Kostrewa
Paul Scherrer Institut
Life Sciences, OFLC/110
CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
Phone: 	+41-56-310-4722
Fax: 	+41-56-310-5288
E-mail:	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sb.web.psi.ch
****************************************

Reply via email to