***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


I agree with Nick's statement here; however, having just gone through this
with a "NSC" publication I can tell you that when you factor in space
constraints of Nature and Science and the incredibly high standard of the
journal and reviewers for these papers, there is little choice but to comply
with their requests to add additional information and/or move some things to
the supplementary materials.  Apart from these journals increasing space
limitations, I don't see an easy solution to this problem.  That said, I
will echo what others have stated that if there is no way to avoid the
dreaded Supplementary Materials, then they should be held to just as high a
standard as the main paper.

Best,

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Hopcroft
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:06 PM
To: CCP4 Bulletin Board
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Use of 'online supplementary material'


***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***


I have read several papers where, in the Results or Discussion sections, 
the reader is referred to 'Figure N in the Supplementary Material', and 
find this quite irritating if I'm reading a hard copy of the paper. 
Supplementary material should be just that - supplementary. It should 
not be part of the biological argument of the paper. Surely 
Supplementary Material should only possibly be referred to in the 
Methods, and only then to point out that information that traditionally 
would not be available at all, is available online?

Nick




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains 
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New 
Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the 
United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as 
Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named 
on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
it from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to