Sankar

We had an Oxford Diffraction PX system, with the same goniometer and detector as the Nova, for 3 years until last Fall when we upgraded to the Nova. We also have 3 other Xcalibur instruments with the same goniometer and control systems. All four diffractometers have performed reliably with very little downtime, the oldest now being nearly 6 years old, and with very little maintainance. The Nova itself has worked well, and has stayed in alignment since it was installed 6 months ago. You can see a few more details at www.crystal.vt.edu.

I do not have experience of the micromax. Obtaining a valid comparison between any two diffractometers is difficult. I can only suggest that you do what the rest of us do, and that is take some of your typical crystals and some of your poorer crystals around and try them out on each of the instruments that you are considering.

   Ross Angel

At 12:27 AM 2/28/2007, Sankar Narayanan Manicka wrote:
Hi,

Our lab is planning to buy an X-ray machine for protein crystallography.

Which system would be best for home source, Oxford diffraction system Xcalibur Nova or a MSC/Rigaku MicroMax-002.


sincerely,
sankar


--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sankar narayanan Manicka                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C/o Prof. S. Krishnaswamy               +91 452 245 9931 - tel
School of Biotechnology                 +91 452 245 9105 - fax
Madurai 625 021                         +91 94860 88613  - cell
TAMIL NADU INDIA  http://www.mkuniversity.org/biotech_school.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------l










>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Ross Angel
Research Professor in Crystallography
Crystallography Laboratory                           Tel: 540-231-7974
Dept. Geosciences                                        Fax: 540-231-3386
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg VA 24060-0420 USA                 http://www.crystal.vt.edu/crystal/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Reply via email to