I believe this is a combination of errors in COMBAT (not setting cell constraint flags correctly) and SCALA (not detecting properly that they are unset)

I believe that I have fixed the Scala error in my latest version

ftp://ftp.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/pub/pre/scala_3.2.28.tar.gz

(I hope!)

There needs to be a better way of getting XDS data into Scala, and I do intend to do this at some point (but not this week)

sorry about this
Phil


On 27 Apr 2007, at 09:33, Stein, ND (Norman) wrote:

Hi Paola

This looks like a bug in Scala to me. The error message should only be printed out if the Relative Length Error exceeds 0.03 or the Angle error exceeds 0.5, whereas in your case both errors are zero. The relevant lines of code are a new addition in 6.0.2, which explains why you didn't have the problem with 6.0.1.

If you can send me your Scala input files and details of the commands you used to run Scala (e.g command line script or com file from ccp4i), I will look into it further.

Norman

Norman Stein
CCP4
Daresbury Laboratory


-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Paola Llinas
Sent: 26 April 2007 15:28
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Error with scala after combat


Hi everybody,

I process data with XDS, then I use Combat to import XDS ASCII data from CORRECT in order to scale whit Scala but it doesn't work. The message error
is:

* Wavelength and cell extracted from Batch headers, with rms variation: * Wavelength: 1.008000 Cell: 91.710 93.670 103.360 90.000
90.000    90.000
* rms 0.000000 rms 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000     0.000

****ERROR: cell deviates too much from constraint ****
    Relative length error    0.000  Angle error     0.00

Cell constraints:

 Scala:  *** Error in batch cell dimensions ***

I changed ccp4 version from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 this week and I has this problem only with 6.0.2 version. (I verified with files that worked with the older
version and I have the same error).
Does somebody know how can I fix this problem?

Thanks,
Paola

Reply via email to