Bernhard Rupp wrote:
I quote from these pages:
"Bijvoet pairs are Bragg reflections which are true symmetry
equivalents to a Friedel pair. These true symmetry equivalents
have *equal amplitudes, even in the presence of anomalous scattering*."
This is poorly worded. I would change it to
A Bijvoet MATE IS A Bragg reflection which IS A true symmetry
equivalent to THE Friedel MATE OF SOME OTHER REFLECTION. These true symmetry
equivalents
have *equal amplitudes, even in the presence of anomalous scattering*.
Note that the Bijvoet mate is symmetry related to the Friedel mate
not the original reflection.
Dale Tronrud
Sounds more like centric or perhaps simply symmetry related to me.
A few lines below:
" A Bijvoet difference refers to the difference in measured
amplitude for a Bijvoet pair"
I don't think you can have it both ways ??
BR
