A standard orientation is anything you want it to be and is usually defined in the context of orthogonal axes. It is simply a reference point from which you apply the results of your search. We usually use one or more of the orthogonal axes as a starting point for easier visualization.

To define a 3-fold axis for a locked search in GLRF (if I understood your message correctly):

locsym 90.0 90.0 120.0 3 polar

This defines a standard orientation for that 3-fold. The search will then move the 3-fold by the given parameters to new orientations and calculate the peak height at those grid points after applying 3-fold NCS. Which axis this actually defines as your standard orientation and how it is then moved during the search depends on your choice of conventions for orthogonalization and polar angle searches.

Cheers,

Jeff


On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Francis E Reyes wrote:

I am experimenting with GLRF and am having trouble calculating the locked self rotation function for a protein of known structure. The protein has a 3 fold NCS axis that is not parallel to a crystallographic axis. I'm at the step of specifying the local symmetry elements for the locked self rotation function.

I guess the goal here is to search for 'one general rotation which will bring the non crystallographic symmetry point group in a "standard" orientation. What does this mean? How do I write the LOCSymmetry instruction for the input file?

My s.g. is P 21 21 21 and the following solutions are found for the normal self rotation function.



    Fine searches around peaks with the slow rotation function --

          The large-term cut-off is  1.50

     Listing of the fitted angles of the top    5 peaks --

No. Old Angles S A N G L E O A N G L E Old Ht. New Ht. (polar, XYK) (polar, XZK) phi psi kap phi psi kap

1 52.000 50.000 120.000 52.000 50.500 120.000 53.246 127.449 120.000 417.36 420.74 2 128.000 130.000 120.000 128.000 129.500 120.000 233.246 127.449 120.000 417.36 420.74 3 128.000 50.000 120.000 129.000 50.000 120.000 126.870 126.536 120.000 400.32 407.69 4 52.000 130.000 120.000 51.000 130.000 120.000 306.870 126.536 120.000 400.32 407.68 5 44.000 60.000 120.000 42.000 61.000 120.000 36.719 125.820 120.000 385.56 391.96

The goal of all this is to use GLRF to explore NCS in cases where structures are not known and molecular replacement

Thanks

FR

---------------------------------------------
Francis Reyes M.Sc.
215 UCB
University of Colorado at Boulder

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D

8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC  686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D

Reply via email to