Begin forwarded message:

From: "Charles W. Carter, Jr" <car...@med.unc.edu>
Date: February 19, 2010 10:28:55 AM EST
To: "George M. Sheldrick" <gshe...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] anomalous difference fourier maps

I'm also inclined to join this discussion. I agree with both Gérard and George. I also sympathize with Ivan. Over the years, I've used Bijvoet Difference Fouriers for many purposes, and every time I attempt to calculate one with CCP4 programs, I must spend an inordinate amount of time experimenting to find the commands that give the result I expect. Often I've kept a toy problem to ensure that I was doing it right. It has always been extremely aggravating, and several times I've had to resort to personal appeals to Eleanor to help me out. It should not have been so obscure, and if it remains so, then shame on CCP4!

I also share Gérard's nostalgia for the days when virtually all crystallographers had first-hand experience with such questions. The enterprise has grown exponentially since then by the inclusion of increasing numbers of people from other fields who can take advantage of the institutionalization of computing software, pioneered by the CCP4, to extend structural biology into realms that were only dreams two decades ago. Both Gérard and George played pivotal roles in that transformation while I did not. Nonetheless, I sympathize with their explicit and implicit sentiments and remind others of two excellent papers describing this important method:

Blow, DM (2003) How Bijvoet Made the Difference. Methods in Enzymology 374, Chapter 1. 3-22.

Roach, Jeffrey (2003) The Bijvoet Difference Fourier Synthesis. Methods in Enzymology 374, Chapter 6. 137-145.

Charlie

On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:57 AM, George M. Sheldrick wrote:

I am inclined to agree with Gerard. Of course if there is a specific
question to CCP4bb about SHELX, I try to answer it. Since I am too
lazy to maintain my own bb, this is very convenient. However I have
stopped 'poaching', for example for the thread in question I resisted
the temptation to point out that SHELXE has a convenient way of making
such anomalous maps, because that would not have been a direct answer
to the question and CCP4 provides similar facilities (and SHARP would
be even better). We use the CCP4 programs (especially REFMAC and COOT)
extensively and are very grateful for all the support we get. In
particular, we should not underestimate the unique role CCP4bb plays
in crystallographic education.

George

Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel. +49-551-39-3021 or -3068
Fax. +49-551-39-22582


On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Gerard Bricogne wrote:

Dear all,

This is a remark I have wanted to make for a long time but managed so far to repress. However, this case is absolutely clear: Ivan was not asking for general advice on how to carry out a general task, but how to perform a
specific task with the CCP4 software.

In response we get (surprise, surprise, ...) another instance of the
relentless touting for Phenix on the CCP4BB, which has long been an
expected (or tolerated?) feature of this BB. Contributions from Phenix developers are of course much appreciated when questions are about general crystallographic matters where their expertise and experience is valuable; but when people ask specifically how to do something with CCP4 programs, could they please not be grabbed by the sleeve and enticed to buy their
sweets from the shop next door?

In this case, for instance, Ivan thanks "guys" (plural) for the answers he got ("All of your suggestions were great"). Perhaps one of those was a CCP4-based answer, but if so it has not even been communicated to the rest of the CCP4BB subscribers - so not only is this touting in bad taste after a while: it even interferes with the sharing of expertise in using the CCP4 software, which after all must be one of the main missions of this BB.

I have long wondered whether anyone on the CCP4 side been assigned the task of answering every question to the Phenix BB by describing how to do it
with CCP4 programs ... .


   With best wishes,

        Gerard.

--
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:53:02PM -0800, Pavel Afonine wrote:
Hi Ivan,

two ways (at least) to do it in PHENIX:

- phenix.refine always computes anomalous difference Fourier map (provided that your input data file contains Fobs(+) and Fobs(-)). The command below
will do it:

phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz strategy=none
main.number_of_macro_cycles=0 output.prefix=maps_only

- you can use phenix.maps that is a general tool to compute a broad variety of maps. Type "phenix.maps" from the command line for usage instructions. You need to have the latest development (or one of) PHENIX nightly build
for this.

All this is available from the GUI too.

Pavel.


On 2/18/10 3:34 PM, xaravich ivan wrote:

Hello,


I wanted to make an anomalous difference fourier map of a structure with zinc bound to it. However I have not been successful in making the map and I would really appreciate your help if anyone could suggest me where I am
going wrong.

I solved this zinc bound structure, by molecular replacement from a calcium bound structure (1.4 angstrom) that I solved. I want to show that the zinc binds to the identical site by the anomalous difference fourier
map.

I am using CCP4i and the steps that I have been taking are, (names of the
files are arbitrary)

1) generating structure factors and phases from the solved coordinates by
SFALL

Input files
zinc bound pdb
original zinc .mtz data from synchrotron

output file
XXXXsfall.mtz

2)merging the XXXXsfall.mtz containing the PHICalc and FCalc columns with the original synchrotron .mtz file containing DANO and SIGDANO by running
CAD.

input files
XXXXsfall.mtz and zinc synchrtron .mtz

output file
CAD.mtz

3) Running FFT to make anomalous map, selecting labels from CAD.mtz as
input files.

There is an output map file but nothing in it. all the values are 0 and the map is not recognized by coot. There is no error message in the log
file.


I must be missing something or doing something wrong/stupid.


Thanks,

Ivan


--

   ===============================================================
   *                                                             *
   * Gerard Bricogne                     g...@globalphasing.com  *
   *                                                             *
   * Global Phasing Ltd.                                         *
   * Sheraton House, Castle Park         Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 *
   * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK               Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 *
   *                                                             *
   ===============================================================



Reply via email to