Hello Pavel, thank you for the PDF file. When I search for the word "phase" starting from page 24, all I find are "phenix.phase_and_build" and "phase_and_build_params.eff" on p. 34, and they don't explain the problem.
I agree that experimental phases are data, but they might be utterly noisy data and therefore hinderous rather than helpful. I can easily integrate a data set to 1.0A and thus have data to 1.0A, if I set the detector distance close enough, but if my crystal only diffracts to 2A, the data between 2A and 1A only will do harm to the map. That's my main point, not the meaning of TLS Cheers, Tim On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:52:03PM -0700, Pavel Afonine wrote: > Hi Tim, > > >> following this discussion, I was wondering how much sense it makes to use >> TLS domains and experimental phases at the same time. > > I guess both things are completely irrelevant. With using experimental > phases you bring in more data. And with using TLS you simply use a more > adequate model for ADPs. It's explained here: > > http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2010_07.pdf > > starting page #24. > > All the best! > Pavel. > > -- -- Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen phone: +49 (0)551 39 22149 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
