Hi Hui, (sorry for non-ccp4 recipe) IF I understand correctly what you want to do, then I guess you can achieve this using Map Superposition:
http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/superpose_maps.htm and/or Structure Comparison tools in PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/structure_comparison.htm where you can superpose many models and corresponding maps, and see all them in one display, along with highlighted differences. Nat Echols, the author of both tools, is someone to ask should you have any questions. Pavel. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, RONG hui Rong <daiwangs...@gmail.com>wrote: > Dear All, > > I have the problem as follows, but I can not find the corresponding > solution. Can somebody give me some suggestions? > Many Thanks, > Hui Rong > > ***************************************************************************************** > [PyMOL] aligning electron density maps > > > Eksterowicz, John > Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:03:43 -0800 > > I have a pdb and xplor file which contain two units of the same > protein/inhibitor complex. What I am trying to do is align the two > proteins to each other so I can compare the subunits. I can accomplish > this by reading in the pdb file twice and aligning the b unit from the > second pdb file to the a unit of the first pdb file. I then split > everything into objects then delete what i don't want. In the end I > have subunits a and b aligned to each other. > > I would like to be able to do the same thing for the electron denisty > map. Is there a way to align maps? > > If I read in a protein and a map, then align the protein to another > protein, the protein moves, but the map remains in it's original > location. Can the map coordinates be transformed somehow? > > Is it possible to create some association with the protein and the map > such that when the protein is aligned, the map will follow? > > Thanks, > John > > ***************************************************************************************** > > On 1/28/11, RONG hui Rong <daiwangs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >
