I have heard "hard" and "soft" many times now about O's and N's--to
what property of those ligands does this metaphor refer?

JPK

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jeffrey D Brodin <jbro...@ucsd.edu> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I modeled in the bis-tris with the tertiary amine and and his imidazole
> coordinating axially and the four oxygens coordinating in the equatorial
> plane. However, it's hard for me to tell from your images if there are two
> His coordinating? Either way, that crescent shape could easily be explained
> by a bis-tris molecule, you'll just have to figure out how exactly to model
> it in. It's also possible that the metal is a Mg, but as people have already
> mentioned, nitrogens probably wouldn't coordinate very tightly to a hard
> metal. Lastly, I'm also not sure off the top of my head how tightly bis-tris
> binds metals, but it should be an easy number to look up. Hope this helps,
>
> Jeff
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Alex Singer wrote:
>
>> Hi -- thank you for all your help.  The majority opinion seems to be a
>> metal for the sphere (Ni from the Ni-affinity column, which (Joe
>> Patel, correct) was used during purification, but Zn and Fe were also
>> mentioned), and either water molecules, bis-tris or some other small
>> molecule forming the crescent.  Just looking at the density, the
>> occupancy would seem to be quite high, so I'm surprised that a Ni ion
>> (or a contaminating metal ion) could have gone through the
>> purification and still remained at high enough concentration to be
>> clearly visible in the crystals.  However, I'll still try this but
>> first some points of clarification and questions which you can either
>> email me seperately or post to the the group.
>>
>> a.  it was collected at beamline 19-BM at Argonne, so radiation damage
>> is an issue.  Thierry Fishmann -- for the gln residue, there was
>> difference density for the gamma carbon after the first conformation
>> was modeled in, thus the addition of the second conformation, which I
>> agree is suspect.  What does the radiation damage do chemically and
>> would that make the gamma carbon more mobile?
>>
>> b.  Jeffrey D Brodin -- how did you model in the bis-tris?  Looking at
>> the bis-tris molecule from Hic-up, was the N at the centre of the
>> crescent and the O6 and O8 at the edges?
>>
>> c.  JR Helliwell -- there are 4 molecules in the AU, but two H138's
>> are pointing into the solvent.  Thus the molar ratio of protein
>> molecules to "thing 1" is 4:1.  Also looking at the images, I see no
>> ice rings -- the images look pretty good.  Can you tell me more about
>> the series termination effects?
>>
>> Again thank you for your help and I'll let the group know how it worked
>> out.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Alex Singer
>> C.H. Best Institute
>> 112 College St. Room 70
>> University of Toronto
>> Toronto, Canada, M5G 1L6
>> 416-978-4033
>



-- 
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
cel: 773.608.9185
email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
*******************************************

Reply via email to