That is the plan and hopefully with help of people from pdb coot, buster, 
phenix, refmac, ccp4 programs will all use mmcif with ligand descriptions 
inside. 
Good will is there, a little bit work is needed.

Regards
Garib

On 25 Jan 2012, at 08:15, Ingo P. Korndoerfer wrote:

> ... and why don't we move on from pdb format to something a bit more
> modern ?
> 
> i think it would only require a handful of programmers to agree on this
> and the rest would (have to) follow.
> 
> i.e. if coot and refmac could both read and write something more modern
> we'd have a huge part of ccp4 world
> covered.
> 
> are we thinking of ourselves at working at the frontiers of science or
> not ... (... o.k. ... different topic, but you get the idea ...)
> 
> ingo
> 
> On 25.01.2012 03:53, Paul Emsley wrote:
>> Thanks to all contributors, I have been informed, educated and
>> entertained.
>> 
>> A bit of background perhaps... (it seems that I have been living in
>> the 0.7 world long enough to forget that not everyone else is here).
>> "[T]he viewer programs don't care about the restraint dictionaries" 
>> says Seth Harris - haha - in olden Coots that was the case... :)  It
>> is my hope that Coot will be used for comparison, evaluation,
>> validation and manipulation of ligands in protein-ligand complexes and
>> their electron density.
>> 
>> My current obsession is with chemical structure diagrams - here's a
>> recent screenshot:
>> http://lmb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/coot/screenshots/Screenshot-example-2010-01-02.png
>> 
>> 
>> ... and here's one I made earlier today, illustrating the sorts of
>> problems I am trying to handle (PI3 Kinase ligand, 4a55):
>> http://lmb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/coot/screenshots/Screenshot-Coot-prodrg-valence-problem.png
>> 
>> amusing, eh?
>> 
>> Anyway, to make the chemical diagram and the 3D bonding representation
>> I need to construct a description of the ligand that contains bond
>> orders.  Hence restraints.  So yes, let me emphasize that this is
>> mostly for drawing pictures and I don't see the use case of refinement
>> of multiple different ligand complexes as very useful.
>> 
>> I do like Dale's idea - the use of HETNAM and synonyms - so, as I
>> understand it, the PDB file has a residue called LIG and the
>> dictionary has a comp-id of
>> "2-(N-methylmethanesulfonamido)-6-(propan-2-yl)pyrimidine" (or
>> XYZ0123456 or whatever) and a HETNAM record in the PDB file provides
>> the mapping.  Is this a solution?   It is attractive because it
>> requires very little work from me.
>> 
>> I did consider Judit's idea, i.e. check the atom names in the
>> coordinates against the dictionary before bonding.  I thought that
>> there may be (too many?) pathological cases where the names did match
>> (at least for ligand fragments) but the chemistry did not.  Let me
>> know if you think that I need not worry so much about that.  This is
>> relatively easy to do.  However, this only solves the "tangle" problem
>> - and I think that that for practical purposes that may be covered now
>> as I have recently turned off restraints auto-loading for several
>> "special" three-letter codes - one can (at least) see "noddy" bonding
>> instead of a tangle.
>> 
>> To answer Garib's point: yes, in Coot there is indeed a single
>> table/dictionary of restraints, with the key/index being the
>> comp-id/residue-name.  It applies to all molecules.  I had not before
>> considered the option of embedding monomer restraints inside a Coot
>> molecule - that might be a cleaner solution. I will ponder on that. 
>> It does mean that you will have to read restraints after reading
>> coordinates though.
>> 
>> And yes, I do occasionally wonder how computational chemistry software
>> (Maestro, Vida for example?) solves this problem.  Presumably such
>> software is used to show several overlaying ligand structures (all
>> called "LIG"?).  And computational chemists like to see chemistry, and
>> not just coloured sticks, right?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Paul.
>> 

Garib N Murshudov 
Structural Studies Division
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Hills Road 
Cambridge 
CB2 0QH UK
Email: ga...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk 
Web http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk



Reply via email to