Hmm - Phaser doesn't usually use such high resolution data? Surprised you are getting any stuff from resolutions higher that 2A.
Whether the intensity at that resolution is meaningful would need careful inspection of the truncate logs - is the wilson plot reasonable? Are the 4th moments linear, etc etc.. Lets look on Monday Eleanor On 15 August 2014 08:14, Huw Jenkins <h.t.jenk...@me.com> wrote: > Hi > > I seem to be getting a lot of outliers rejected by Phaser with data > processed with the latest ctruncate which are not present when data is > processed with the older version (or old truncate) - has something been > changed in the code that would cause this? > > With CCP4 6.4: ctruncate version 1.15.9 : 15/07/14 > > Phaser logfile: > > Outliers with a probability less than 1e-06 will be rejected > There were 489 (0.5620%) reflections rejected > > H K L reso F probability > 9 4 49 1.65 126.969 8.862e-41 > -2 5 50 1.66 124.322 2.404e-30 > 0 5 50 1.66 131.982 3.516e-35 > -14 7 47 1.66 123.548 3.541e-27 > 20 20 35 1.66 87.870 5.191e-88 > -1 15 46 1.66 114.059 8.326e-130 > -6 21 41 1.67 104.887 7.047e-50 > -9 4 49 1.67 120.765 5.821e-22 > 3 34 20 1.67 93.244 6.844e-41 > 7 4 49 1.67 131.702 2.985e-36 > -3 34 20 1.67 106.603 5.786e-57 > 4 37 0 1.67 119.036 3.934e-48 > 1 16 45 1.67 107.599 2.356e-55 > -14 9 46 1.67 122.033 2.371e-24 > -5 33 22 1.67 110.802 3.492e-60 > 3 33 22 1.68 102.663 6.189e-46 > -7 4 49 1.68 120.855 1.875e-20 > -2 6 49 1.68 132.650 6.233e-84 > 9 19 41 1.68 91.717 2.857e-21 > -17 12 43 1.69 112.959 5.298e-37 > More than 20 outliers (see VERBOSE output) > > > With CCP4 6.4: ctruncate version 1.15.5 : 05/06/14 > > Phaser logfile: > > Outliers with a probability less than 1e-06 will be rejected > There were 1 (0.0011%) reflections rejected > > H K L reso F probability > 0 2 0 31.00 913.757 1.369e-08 > > Thanks, > > > Huw