This looks like the mapping you are after:
http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/docs/pdb_to_pdbx_correspondences.html
It maps only the structured PDB data items to their equivalent mmCIF
items. For instance REMARK 2 is not there, but REMARK 200 is. The
resolution value should then be in "REMARK 200 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH"
(corresponding to mmCIF data item _refine.ls_d_res_high).
Jose
On 07.07.2015 19:05, Phil Jeffrey wrote:
I'm updating some code to have limited mmCIF/PDB format
interoperability and have hit a snag. While I can infer the
connection between some data items in the PDB header REMARK and the
items in mmCIF I can't definitively deduce some others. In particular
the mapping of
REMARK 2 RESOLUTION
seems a little ambiguous and the dictionary documentation doesn't help
in this regard.
Does anyone know where to find an explicit mapping of one data field
to another between the two formats ? (I don't expect there to be a
data field in the PDB header for everything in mmCIF but I do for the
reverse case).
Thanks
Phil Jeffrey
Princeton
