Hi Claire, Isn’t the simplest answer just that the EDS server is calculating the completeness for a different amount of data (high res limit of 1.92 Å), whereas in your Depositor data it was only calculated to a high res limit of 2.1 Å? This would probably be the result of you measuring reflections out to 1.92 Å during data collection but then manually specifying a 2.1 Å high resolution cutoff during refinement. The refinement program will calculate statistics based on your input limit of 2.1 Å, but if the MTZ file actually contains some measured data out to 1.92 Å, then the EDS would calculate a different, lower completeness if its default setting is simply to use all data present in the reflections file.
Does that explain things, or do you actually have something else in mind as to the cause of the discrepancy? Matthew --- Matthew J. Whitley, Ph.D. Research Associate Angela Gronenborn Lab Department of Structural Biology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:31:38 -0500 > From: Claire Smith <sclaire7...@gmail.com> > Subject: PDB validation of structure factors > > Hello, > > I am trying to run the PDB validation report for a structure that I have > refined in Phenix (data was analyzed with Xtriage). However, the run > reports a discrepancy on the completeness of data, as follows: > > % Data completeness 97.4 (29.08-2.10) Depositor > > (in resolution range) 87.5 (29.08-1.92) EDS > > > Why this discrepancy? > > > Thanks so much, > > Claire
