The ideas was to cut all datasets at say 30% CC1/2 to see how they differ in resolution I/sigI etc. for that given CC1/2 …
From: Eleanor Dodson <eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk> Date: Friday, 27. October 2017 at 23:12 To: "Schulz, Eike-Christian" <eike.sch...@mpsd.mpg.de> Cc: "CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] using CC1/2 to define resolution limit in Xscale Do you mean the CC1/2 for the 15 merged data sets? Doesnt AIMLESS give you this - treat each one as a seperate run, and you get the stats for each run, as well as the overall result. Then you can check where CC1/2 reaches your chosen limit..\ Eleanor PS - not sure if it is an absolute criteria - it might depend to some extent on multiplicity.. On 27 October 2017 at 21:31, Schulz, Eike-Christian <eike.sch...@mpsd.mpg.de<mailto:eike.sch...@mpsd.mpg.de>> wrote: Dear all, I would like to compare > 15 datasets and would like to use a common CC1/2 value as an objective criterion to determine the resolution cut-off. All data were integrated in XDS. Is there a convenient way to apply this in XSCALE or in any of its alternatives? With best regards, Eike
