Dear Tommi, did you check whether you collected any reflections at all that should be absent for the second screw axis? If there are non - which could easily happen with low resolution, incomplete data - pointless and XDS might be conservative and not estimate the likelihood for the second screw-axis.
MR, however, will pick up the space group with all data, and thus be able to tell between P2212 and P22121 whether or not you recorded reflections that are expected to be absent. Best, Tim On 08/08/2018 04:29 PM, Kajander, Tommi A wrote: > Hi, > Any clues why the followting happens: pointless (and just looking at the XDS > output) clearly tells there is one screw axis in P-ortorhombic (P2212) > yet phaser gives the best Z-scores in P22121. (...I suspect this may be to do > with twinning - might be monoclinic twiined still though now processes very > well in P222.) > > If i run the mtz after XDSCONV (ie F2MTZ) via pointless (instead of directly > after XDS) it also suggests this - but i suppose i am not suppose to run > merged data via pointless. > > Thanks for comments, > > Tommi > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > -- -- Paul Scherrer Institut Tim Gruene - persoenlich - OSUA/204 CH-5232 Villigen PSI phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
