The fact that chi^2 is approximately 1.0 in all shells says that the deviations 
are about what is expected from the error model. The fact that Rpim is much 
lower than Rmeas means that you have rather high redundancy. This would seem to 
be a case of collecting low dose per image and making up for it with high 
redundancy, a strategy that has been recommended to ensure a full dataset even 
in the case of high radiation sensitivity.  In my opinion the high Rmerge is 
nothing to worry about. Look instead at CC1/2 and I/sigI which seem fine.

On 09/28/2018 04:09 AM, Zhang Foggy wrote:
Dear All,

Sorry for the off-topic.

I recently collected a set of data. The diffraction spots are extremely sharp. 
However, When I used HKL3000 to scale it, I get a final resolution at 3.1A with 
overall R-merge ~0.54 (R-merge in the highest 3.2A-3.1A shell: 1.59). Then I 
solve the structure with final R value 0.19 and R free value 0.24 although I 
know this Rmerge value is totally unacceptable, and the density looks perfect.

I also tried to collect other four set of data with different crystals. 
unfortunately, all of them have same problem.

I ask one of my friend who is an expert in HKL3000, but he had no idea about 
it. Does anyone has suggestions?

Here is the scale information for your review:
Space group: P43 (I also tried P1, the Rmerge value is still similar)

Shell Lower Upper Average      Average     Norm. Linear Square
  limit    Angstrom       I   error   stat. Chi**2  R-fac  R-fac  Rmeas   Rpim  
CC1/2    CC*
       50.00   6.67    11.6     0.9     0.3  1.165  0.191  0.284  0.198  0.052  
0.975  0.994
        6.67   5.30     4.5     0.5     0.3  0.952  0.317  0.313  0.329  0.086  
0.971  0.993
        5.30   4.63     7.3     0.7     0.5  0.961  0.293  0.297  0.304  0.081  
0.975  0.994
        4.63   4.21     7.0     0.8     0.6  0.986  0.369  0.358  0.382  0.101  
0.969  0.992
        4.21   3.91     5.6     0.8     0.6  1.040  0.522  0.491  0.541  0.142  
0.955  0.988
        3.91   3.68     4.6     0.9     0.7  1.064  0.718  0.669  0.746  0.203  
0.929  0.981
        3.68   3.49     3.5     0.9     0.8  1.092  1.059  0.986  1.101  0.299  
0.882  0.968
        3.49   3.34     2.6     0.9     0.8  1.092  1.382  1.298  1.438  0.395  
0.829  0.952
        3.34   3.21     2.1     0.9     0.8  1.084  1.543  1.489  1.614  0.468  
0.772  0.933
        3.21   3.10     1.6     0.9     0.8  1.070  1.591  1.669  1.680  0.529  
0.645  0.885
   All reflections      5.0     0.8     0.6  1.048  0.538  0.487  0.559  0.153

Thank you.

Liang


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to