Dear Scott, For the grant application, better question might be how many structural biologists are out there, because "a crystallographer" may be interpreted differently depending who is reading the grant application: are these the people who know crystallography, or people who solve structures using crystallography? The former category doesn't necessarily fall under the target audience for your grant application, but the latter does. Furthermore, with "structural biologists" you can claim a larger impact factor, IMO. Best wishes, Nukri
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:54 PM Scott Horowitz <horow...@umich.edu> wrote: > Hi all, I was recently asked how many biological > crystallographers plus cryo-EM users there are in the world (in relation to > how many people could therefore be theoretically impacted by Foldit > electron density tools, for the purposes of grant funding). I'm a bit at a > loss as to even what order of magnitude to provide. Any thoughts about how > to estimate a number? > > > Thanks, > > Scott > > > Scott Horowitz, Ph.D. > > Assistant Professor > > Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry > > Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging > > University of Denver > > > > ECS Building > > 2155 E. Wesley Ave > > Denver, CO 80208 > > Phone: 303-871-4326 > > Fax: 303-871-7915 > > Email: scott.horow...@du.edu > > Office: Room 561 Lab: Room 505 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
