Their web page indicates they’re running a 315, so there are limits on useful 
low dose data collection. If you can get to a beamline with a pixel array 
detector and mount your samples carefully you’ll probably get more from low 
dose methods.

The key thing with this is minimising background from loop, drop etc so the 
photons you measure are as far as possible from the sample under study. You’ll 
probably benefit from combining data from multiple samples if they are 
isomorphous.

Obviously your ultimate resolution will be limited by the number of photons 
your sample can scatter before suffering measurable damage... but combining 
samples can help you here

Best wishes Graeme

On 29 Aug 2019, at 19:07, Kimberly Stanek 
<ksta...@uci.edu<mailto:ksta...@uci.edu>> wrote:

ALS 822. I tried as low as 0.2 sec exposure but it didn't seem to help much.


Kimberly Stanek
Postdoctoral Researcher, Goulding Lab
Co-chair, UCI Postdoctoral Association
University of California, Irvine
Natural Science I, Room 2302
(949) 824-0014
________________________________
From: James Holton <jmhol...@lbl.gov<mailto:jmhol...@lbl.gov>>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:50 AM
To: Kimberly Stanek <ksta...@uci.edu<mailto:ksta...@uci.edu>>; 
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> 
<CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Semet derivative dying almost immediately in beam

What exposure time are you using?  And which beamline?

-James Holton
MAD Scientist

On 8/29/2019 10:26 AM, Kimberly Stanek wrote:
Hi folks,

We have a protein that we have been trying to solve the structure of for a 
while now but so far haven't been able to get any diffraction better than 
~4.5A. I was able to collect a full 360 degrees of data and index, but MR is 
failing so we have turned to de novo phasing.

Recently we prepared crystals of the Semet derivative under the same condition. 
While these crystals diffracted to about the same resolution, I found they were 
dying after just one or two snaps, even with increased beam attenuation and 
decreased exposure time. I am wondering if anyone has experienced anything like 
this before and had any suggestions on what to do about it.

Thank you,



Kimberly Stanek
Postdoctoral Researcher, Goulding Lab
Co-chair, UCI Postdoctoral Association
University of California, Irvine
Natural Science I, Room 2302
(949) 824-0014

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

-- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to