Your pictures 1 3 & 4 don't seem to show multiple occupancy? Maybe the difference map 2 is saying - too much complexity ?? Eleanor
On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 23:29, Michael Colaneri <colane...@oldwestbury.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > We have alternate conformations for a number of residues in a structure > and one is a Val that I show in the attachment. It was refined with group > occupancy and the temp factors are fine. It was also present in an early > map from autobuild at a time it was not in the model. > > The question I have is why the difference map looks this way. Is it > inadequate temp factor/occupancy model, high thermal motion, bulk solvent > in the region, disorder of some sort? I would appreciate any help. > > Thank you. > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: > https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/
