WEll - I think this explains your crazy B values - you have somehow
*normalised* the data at processing stagr.
>From the pointless log..
You usually dont need a reference data set and certainly not a set of
calculated structure factors.
Do you have CCP4I2 installed?
If so just feed the integrated data through the processing and send me the
log perhaps?
....
*Reference list generated by structure factor calculation*
  from coordinate file
/home/janani-ganesh/Documents/JG/XData/K232Q_24042025_P72A5/CCP4I/K232Q_P72_phaser.1_refmac1.pdb
Spacegroup: P 32 2 1
Cell:   81.84  81.84 134.77  90.00  90.00 120.00
Maximum resolution used:   1.884
Number of reflections:     42901
I*ntensity normalisation: B-factor =   -8.7*

*And taken from the phenix log:*
Note that the <Fobs> at low resolution is slightly LOWER than at the
highest resolution! This is unlikely. for a protein!
.....
F_model = k_total * (F_calc + k_mask * F_mask)

    k_total = k_isotropic * k_anisotropic
   Resolution    Compl Nwork Nfree R_work    <Fobs>  <Fmodel> kiso   kani
kmask
 38.004-13.464   66.21    90     6 0.5449   232.778   190.690 0.824 0.739
0.353
 13.427-11.087   93.58    99     3 0.1952   *459.972   428.082 *1.279 0.749
0.340
 11.084-9.179    91.06   153    10 0.1983   502.739   469.985 1.271 0.749
0.330
  9.142-7.564    88.75   271    13 0.2210   405.976   376.935 1.215 0.751
0.329
  7.548-6.244    92.16   492    25 0.2733   342.193   302.079 1.212 0.751
0.328
  6.239-5.156    97.23   895    51 0.2545   365.657   321.767 1.164 0.750
0.321
  5.153-4.256    97.19  1575    83 0.1988   487.348   449.464 1.271 0.749
0.270
  4.256-3.514    99.83  2815   149 0.2169   582.502   526.163 1.702 0.748
0.084
  3.514-2.902    99.89  4989   263 0.2427   597.717   534.626 2.337 0.747
0.060
  2.901-2.396    99.85  8718   460 0.2988   532.605   456.384 2.752 0.744
0.000
  2.396-2.103    97.60  9284   494 0.3208   *546.159   458.454* 3.232 0.742
0.000

So fix your data processing first - then your B factors should become
sensible and the R factors also - you are overweighting the high resolution
data greatly


And if the crystal is twinned the space group is actually P 32..

Cheers Eleanor



On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 08:04, Janani Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Professor,
>
> Thank you for your response. I had tried out TLS as well to understand the
> trend, but it did not work. I am attaching the detwin and pointless log
> files for your reference.
>
> I even set the B-factors to an arbitrary value of 30 and performed
> refinement with overall B-factors, but there was no change in the B-factors
> at all.
> Is it possible for you to look at my data and help me with this issue?
>
>
> With my best regards,
> Janani Ganesh
> PhD Scholar, Protein Crystallography Section,
> Homi Bhabha National Institute,
> Mumbai, India.
> Contact No: +91-22-25594062 / +91-7506237778
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to