David, as I'm not very familiar with this license stuff I just want you to know that the original SRTP code is LGPL licensed. However, I did some testing (make it interoperable with other SRTP implementations) and additions to it, removing bugs, some code cleanup etc.
As for the ZRTP code: this was done entirely by myself. As a first shot I released it for minisip using their LGPL. If there is a requirement to change some stuff in this part please let me know. Regards, Werner David Sugar wrote: > At present we use essentially the same license as libstdc++ does in the > GNU Compiler Collection > (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html). > However, we are looking how srtp additions will effect this. > > George A. Papayiannis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I apologize for asking a question like this on a developers list, but >> I'm running out of options in understanding the implications of GPL on >> ccRTP. I know that GPL requires all derivative works of GPL'd code >> must be GPL'd also. But in the case of ccRTP, I would be using this >> code as a transport to a larger application. >> >> The question is, if I create a client/server application which uses >> ccRTP as the transport, do I need to license the entire client/server >> application under GPL? >> >> If anyone has any thoughts, I would really appreciate it. >> Thanks, >> George >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ccrtp-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ccrtp-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel _______________________________________________ Ccrtp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel
