> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Jay Jaeger <cu...@charter.net> wrote: > > On 10/13/2015 12:02 AM, tony duell wrote: >> >> ... >> It appears to be electrolytic. You have to keep the paper damp (there is a >> wick >> inside that you put water on. The paper goes between a helical electrode on >> a spinning drum and a straight strip, the latter being replaced when you fit >> a new >> roll of paper. Whether it is some chemical in the paper that changes colour, >> or metal >> depositied from the electrode I don't know (the former seems more likely). >> >> I have never got it to work. Whether that is due to electronic problems >> (that I can >> fix) or chemical problems with the old paper (which I can't) I don't yet >> know. >> >> -tony >> > > I had a little Comprint printer in the 1970s/1980s that used something > sort of like this. The paper was aluminum coated, thus conductive. The > head was a high voltage electrode unit that burned away the aluminum > layer. (I can't imagine any kind of deposition technology in that > era...). The head flew back and forth really fast, doing one pixel-line > at a time.
There are all sorts of oddball printing technologies from back then. I remember one (from a lab instrument, not a printer or terminal) that used aluminum-coated paper, but the coating was on the back of the paper. The writing was done with a high voltage electrode just as you describe, but the result was that the sparks would scorch the paper and leave a thin black mark. I don't remember what the VT55 used. Tony's comment does sound plausible; I distinctly remember "electrolytic" printing technology though no details. I wonder if it might help to take a bit of the paper to a competent chemist for analysis, to find out what the active ingredient is. That might help give a clue what is needed to make it work. paul